You Can Trust Government


The Hidden Hand That Shaped History



Hidden Hand


Shaped History



Secret Symbols of the Rosicrucians

Secret Symbols








Veritas News Service


CAJI/IS Exlusive


Author Chuck Frank


The U.S. Constitution, which is all but four handwritten pages long, is dwarfed by an out-of-control U.S. bureaucratic process which speaks for itself with reams of legalism and regulations while the fat cats of the agencies plan for additional policies and their own retirements. Yet all that is needed is one paragraph to take care of and eliminate the extortion of an over-regulated dinosaur which has produced numerous lost rights, the invasion of privacy, world record incarceration, and big government. Here is my proposal to stop this bullet train before it is too late. Except for a few instances where there is a clear and present danger to human life and runaway abuse, let it be known that WE THE PEOPLE now declare by decree a moratorium on all laws being made either by Congress, Presidential executive orders, state legislators, governors, county supervisors, or city councils.

We include in this declaration a proposal that all government agencies be cut at least by half or more. In addition, we now call upon the people, with the help of grand juries, pastors, farmers, private investigators, small businessmen and women, along with those of the newly elected impartial watchdog committees, to roll back any previous laws and over taxation that have recklessly infringed upon the inalienable God-given rights of the people. Thus the people’s protections of true representation and liberty, will once again flourish in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Big government’s treasonous trashing of the U.S. Constitution and the economy will be dealt with while two-thirds of the outsourcing of our jobs to numerous countries abroad will be stopped. Also included in this decree is the following: Lobbying by bloated special interest organizations which are worth millions is banned while any person that runs for any office in America or those persons who are appointed to government agencies or other offices will have extensive background checks. Also, persons who are part of government agencies in no way can be an ex CEO of a megacorporation. This includes any person who performed their duties in any executive capacity such as a vice-president while being part of a for-profit or a nonprofit corporation such as a Fortune 500 company. Furthermore, any presently-employed government czar who had previously served with corporations of this kind will be relieved of their duties and may not serve in any part of government.

Does this sound like communism? Absolutely not. This proposal is fully anti-communist as anyone can see. This is necessary in that the corporate lords of the nation and those of the worldly shadow elite are taking us down a road of tyranny and monopolistic destruction to where we as a people are very quickly losing our freedom and individual rights to a carefully-orchestrated international anti-sovereignty meltdown. It is brought to you by those rogue individuals of the republic, the U.N., and the New World Order. We as a people have been taken captive by an evil NWO plan of world domination that is meant to enslave the entire planet for the benefit of a few. It is now time to act for it is one minute to midnight. The sinister grand plan is spelled out here by David Rockefeller:

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination (i.e., an ethical form democracy, “freedom to choose” based upon true christian guidelines; the author’s definition) practiced in past centuries."

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.  "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

“Nor did these lawyers and bankers walk about suffused with guilt. They had the moral equivalent of teflon on their soul. Church on Sunday, foreclose on Monday.” —Norman Mailer, New York Review of Books, 27 March 2002

The Tower Of Babel Rises Again – It’s Called the Utah Data Center by Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.

The Tower of Babel Rises Again

It’s Called the Utah Data Center

Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.

I know I said I retired, however there are significant issues that need to be revealed about what’s happening under the guise of protecting us . . . NOT!

ALL semblance of privacy will be eliminated. Privacy has already been significantly eroded, however, you will not believe the total, complete control and invasiveness, that is planned for your future . . .

The Tower Of Babel Rises Again-It’s Called the Utah Data Center







Author: Chuck Frank


Globalists and environmentalists have a lot of common ground. They will use any crisis or even create one to further their objectives such as climate change. Then again, if 1000 endangered species isn’t enough ammunition to dismantle dams and the industrial complex of America, use the 2008 housing meltdown which was the result of the deregulation of the banks when Bill Clinton signed it into law before he left office. By doing so, he destroyed the country’s economic protections which had been in place since the Great Depression. Allen Greenspan and the rest of the banking club rode this wave of destruction. These “experts” placed the entire nation at risk as they were entwined with a “greed driven” deregulation policy which then brought on the great foreclosure disaster to millions. With such a failed track record, why is the Federal Reserve still in business and where is our own government’s credibility? It is zero!

Looking further into the wonderful world of finance, let’s not forget when the elite bankers came to town with their sinister scheme which would rake in billions selling an overblown environmental crisis while making loans to the many unsuspecting nations who were already broke. With interest, the IMF and the World Bank was there to “help” but when these nations could no longer pay their loans, then came the land grab. Countries like Germany are already waking up to the cold reality of a green energy sink hole that has an appetite for endless sustainability while costing the people extra Euros that are in the billions.  Here is Daniel Wentzel’s take on it: “Almost all predictions about the expansion and cost of German wind turbines and solar panels have turned out to be wrong – at least by a factor of two, sometimes by a factor of five.” –Daniel Wentzel, Die Welt, 20 October 2012.

The shock waves and cost burdens for consumers and industry have reached a “barely tolerable level that threatens the deindustrialization of Germany,” outraged business organizations said. All of Germany has been arguing about who is to blame for the “electricity price hammer” while Chancellor Angela Merkel had “promised” that green energy subsidies would not be more than 3.6 cents per kilowatt hour. Now, however, German citizens have to support renewable energy by more than EUR 20 billion – instead of 14 billion Euros. Daniel Wentzel asks the question, “How could Merkel be so wrong?” This isn’t “saving” the planet or anybody for that matter, but what it does is create havoc and poverty. What if you were a third world country implementing green energy? Soup lines anybody? How many missions is America going to need?


Since 2001, the U.S. has lost 42,400 factories:


America, like Germany, is crashing into a true de-industrialization mode. So what does the green agenda really have to offer? The best example is to look at the wages of the Western Rivers Conservancy out of Portland, Oregon, where employees currently earn about $72,186.00 per year (their stats) while our minimum wage may only bring in $16,000.00. This is the environmentalist grand plan for saving the planet or themselves? Everybody please say “thank you” to Western Rivers while the rest of America does with much less. Don’t forget too that the Klamath Dam at the headwaters of the Klamath River is on their chopping block list. One must understand how Western Rivers works it. In their own words, here are a few of their outrageous “grand plan” goals that are mentioned in their annual report:

“Increase the funds to 10 million dollars to “SEIZE” LAND PURCHASES.

“Focus on high quality rivers, and CONTROL WHOLE RIVERS FROM THE SOURCE TO THE MOUTH.”


Take note above. It is “Rivers” ending with a big “S.” Is the Feather River next? How about the Sacramento River or the American River? With these organizations there is no end to their appetite. The rivers could be full to the brim with fish pre-American Revolution times yet they would still not be happy. It’s called more donations to their fabricated cause. The endgame: sabotage American family farmers through burdensome federal policies and limit their amount of water.

Remember the Delta queens and the smelt fish debacle? Deprivatize family farms while Big Agri takes over. Is there any end to the loss and the destruction of family farms in America? Historically, there is also something to be learned here from Stalin’s 1933 takeover of Ukraine’s family farms. Fact check: 7 million men, women, and children died from starvation. Are we still America or are we some other country that is being ruled by the green czars of a lost republic? Question: When are the American people going to act and stand up for their inalienable rights, or perhaps they will just be content with their food stamps and cellphones? Something tells me they won’t be. “One does not live on bread alone.”

The Human-Hating Roots of the Green Movement

Behind the environmentalist facade lies a totalitarian agenda that is already being enacted.

By Arnold Ahlert April 24, 2013

Monday was the 43rd celebration of Earth Day, an event hailed as an effort to promote responsible stewardship of the environment. Fittingly, it is also the birthdate of Communist Party creator Vladimir Lenin, a reality that the radical environmentalists responsible for the creation of Earth Day dismiss as a mere coincidence. Yet there is little question that under the guise of "saving the planet," the earth-firster crowd would be more than willing to impose the same kind of totalitarian control over the masses envisioned by Lenin.

Like communism, the radical environmentalism that forms the heart of Earth Day celebrations is all about collectivism. In a 2007 column for the Cato Institute, former Czech Republic president Vaclav Klaus called environmentalism one of the main dangers to freedom in the 21st century. "Environmentalism only pretends to deal with environmental protection," writes Klaus. "Behind their people- and nature-friendly terminology, the adherents of environmentalism make ambitious attempts to radically reorganize and change the world, human society, our behavior, and our values."

The Earth Day concept was developed by then-Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-WI), Congress's foremost environmentalist. Nelson also helped to develop college "sit-ins," where professors surreptitiously abandoned their curriculums to lecture students on the evils of imperialist America and the virtues of communism, a misunderstood system of governance that merely need better implementation to succeed.

Nelson's efforts were facilitated by Denis Hayes. Hayes was a student at Stanford University, where he was elected student body president and became a high-profile anti-Vietnam War activist who once helped lead a student siege of a campus weapons-research laboratory.

Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich was the third man behind the Earth Day cult. Ehrlich's claim to fame was The Population Bomb, a book that predicted societal disintegration, and hundreds of millions of deaths from famine — by the 1980s — due to the "cancer" of human population growth. In 1969 Nelson and Ehrlich decided that a nation enthralled by the ethos of Woodstock was ready for a nationwide teach-in on environmentalism. Hayes was brought in to coordinate and implement the operation. The trio decided that the first Earth Day would be held on April 22, 1970 — the centennial celebration of Lenin's birthday.

The philosophical alignment between Lenin, who issued a decree known as "On Land," declaring all natural resources the exclusive property of the state, and environmentalists, who believe that private enterprise and private property are impediments to saving the planet, are unmistakeable. To a large extent, those radical impulses have been realized in the United States. The federal government owns nearly 30 percent of all the land in the country, including five states where it owns more than half. Much of it remains federalized via the Endangered Species Act, which allows government to cordon off property from development if an endangered species is living on it. Furthermore, until the Supreme Court stopped the EPA last year, that agency was using the Clean Water Act to mandate what private property owners could or could not do with their own property, while preventing those owners from seeking recourse in the courts. "In a nation that values due process, not to mention private property, such treatment is unthinkable," said Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the court's decision.

The EPA was created by Congress eight months after the first Earth Day celebration.

Another major player promoting Earth Day is the Earth Day Network (EDN), founded in 1994 by the organizers of the first Earth Day celebration. The most insidious plank of EDN's "core programs" is its "Greening Schools and Promoting Environmental Education" agenda. EDN provides educators with a variety of games, interactive quizzes and other aids, that enable them to teach kids from kindergarten through twelfth grade how to be the best "green" citizens they can be. Much of EDN's emphasis is centered on making kids feel guilty about the size of their "ecological footprint" in comparison to children from other nations. "If everyone lived like you," EDN tells children, "we would need [X-number of] planets" to sustain the lives of all the earth's people." EDN's message is subtle but clear: capitalism is unjust and, as a result, America is using more than its "fair share" of the world's resources.

Hayes, who sits on EDN's Board of Directors, makes this plain. "Under communism prices were not allowed to reflect economic reality," Hayes contends. "Under capitalism, prices don't reflect ecological reality. In the long run, the capitalist flaw — if uncorrected — may prove to be the more catastrophic. …" Moreover, Hayes makes no bones about the fact that he considers human population growth to be the "most worrisome" environmental problem. "If everyone currently in the world aspires to consume at the same level as, say, the average Swede does, the human population already exceeds the planet's carrying capacity," writes Hayes.

Ira Einhorn who hosted the first Earth Day event at the Fairmount Park in Philadelphia on April 22, 1970, made his own personal contribution to population reduction. Seven years after the event, police raided his apartment and found the remains of his girlfriend, after one of his neighbors complained about a reddish- brown, foul-smelling liquid leaking into the ceiling directly below Einhorn's closet. After 23 years on the run, he was extradited from France, convicted of murder and is serving a life sentence.

Another major player in the radical environmentalist movement is a Canadian named Maurice Strong. After starting his career in the oil business in the 1950s, Strong cultivated contacts in the Canadian government. By 1966, he became head of the Canadian International Development Agency. His success there impressed UN Secretary General U Thant, who asked him to organize the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment in 1972, better known as the first "Earth Summit." The "Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment" created there offered a number of socialist/Marxist ideas, including the transfer of wealth from developed countries to under-developed ones, the need for population control, and "extensive cooperation among nations and action by international organizations in the common interest," aka world governance. It offered 26 principles to advance this agenda.

In 1992, another Earth Summit was held in Rio, out of which the "Rio Declaration on Environment and Development" emerged. Another 27 principles, similar to the pie-in-the-sky, wealth transferring eco- socialist/Marxist agenda that emerged 20 years earlier, was added to the mix. That summit was also led by Strong.

One world government is the primary impetus behind a UN project known as Agenda 21 — originated by Maurice Strong. In 1993, the UN explained its mission. "Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people…Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced." 178 countries have currently adopted Agenda 21. Strong himself, who currently resides in the People's Republic of China, expressed his personal view on what must happen for Agenda 21 to succeed. "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" he asked.

There is little question that such people will try. That is why the term "climate change," which replaced "global warming" when a decade of steady temperatures threatened the credibility of the environmentalists' "irrefutable data" — along with the movement itself — has itself been replaced by the newest catchword, "sustainability." The United Nations Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development held in June 2012 issued a report that reiterated the totalitarian ambitions of both Earth Summits and the Agenda 21

project. "Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective," detailed the trillions of dollars that must be spent moving the entire world towards a "green" economy, where every aspect of human behavior would be regulated by a top-down, command-and-control bureaucracy.

Havel foresaw exactly such a development. "There is no doubt that it is our duty to rationally protect nature for future generations," he writes. "The followers of the environmentalist ideology, however, keep presenting us with various catastrophic scenarios with the intention of persuading us to implement their ideas. That is not only unfair but also extremely dangerous."

That is a far more elegant way of describing how those who celebrate Earth Day envision implementing their agenda. Less elegant, but far more familiar, is the phrase that both communists and radical environmentalists thoroughly embrace, as in, "by any means necessary."

Earth Day was the impetus behind this mushrooming desire for global power, hidden by an environmental facade. Villainous mankind, whose expressions of waywardness have changed over the decades — from the polluter, to the deforester, to the animal species eliminator, and finally to climate fouler of the entire planet — must be brought to heel. Toward that end there has been a remarkable consistency. Earth Day remains a celebration of anti-capitalism, anti-humanism, population control and ill-disguised totalitarianism.

Two of Earth Day's founders make these assertions clear. Denis Hayes: "America has a mechanism to deal with things that are not well-served by the market. It's called government. Government is the way that we assert the fundamental values of the majority, constrained by the rights of the minority. Government is the realm in which we decide what is dispensable and what is — literally — priceless." Paul Ehrlich: "A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions."

Arnold Ahlert is a columnist for FrontPage Magazine1

Infantilized Americans made to ‘shelter in place’


Remember the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave? All that was over as of the early morning of April 19, 2013. 

Of course, as everybody knows, the free and brave America of yore has been dead or dying for a long time. But on Friday her much-abused corpse was officially directed to remain indoors while a 19-year-old boy-bombing suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, was given the run of Greater Boston, formerly headquarters of the American Revolution. He was eventually run down hiding under a tarp over a boat in the working-class suburb of Watertown.

Something like a million people were sternly warned to stay inside all day. By and large, it would appear, they did.

The specific language of the official entreaty was to "shelter in place". Do not go to work, do not go to school! Keep your doors locked! In fact, don't even answer your door, keep it shut to anyone and everyone unless they are a "credentialed, uniformed police officer."

Armored personnel carriers rolled through parts of Greater Boston, the home of Sam and John Adams, on the 238th anniversary of the battles at Lexington and Concord. It was just four days after Patriots Day, the celebration of the start of hostilities against the British Crown, the battles that eventually led to the founding of the country we are still pleased to call the United States of America.

Oddly enough, the fighting actually occurred on April 19, 1775, so whatever evil orchestrated all this managed to ruin both dates. Patriots Day is a holiday unique to a city still celebrated for its rebellious, freedom-loving spirit.

On Friday, April 19, 2013, an earth-shaking revolution, defined by its defiance of the arbitrary and irresponsible use of state force, was officially and finally suppressed. And the agent of that suppression was not a foreign power or a far-away monarch, but the once-revolutionary government itself. 

Oh, of course, it was all done for the benefit of the American Citizen, that increasingly pathetic, helpless creature who relies on the state to make him safe and a handful of giant corporations to make him happy.

Just after six in the afternoon, after about 12 hours of trembling in their homes, the command that Greater Bostonians remain indoors was rescinded. A few hours later, the last of two advertised Boston Marathon-bombing suspects was apprehended.

But it was already too late for those old American ideals — the ones concerning justice, freedom from fear, checks and balances on power, the presumption of innocence, Miranda warnings, government of, by and for the people… you know, all that jazz.

Oh, how the people of Greater Boston cheered the heavily armored men and women of our ever-more-militarized police forces! A few people, thank heaven, did think it odd that an entire metro area could be so easily brought to its knees by a single teenager, or rather his fanatically zealous accomplices in law enforcement. But the vast crowd welcomed their oppressors as liberators, and proclaimed them heroes.

Lost along with the struggle for freedom and independence, as it always is, was a sense of history. Not just about the real spirit of the old Revolution, but the countless previous efforts to undermine it. You know, the wars and crises that powerful and rich people have always used to accumulate more wealth and power. An endless parade of manufactured emergencies, most often begun by false pretext and mendacious invention.

It's a long and contentious list, so let me give you just one exceptionally well-documented example that seems apropos, though it took place overseas.

According to the BBC, among many other sources, "Operation Gladio" was a decades-long effort led by the United States to influence events in Europe. The technique? Hire fascists to blow people up at outdoor festivals, in train stations, supermarkets, etc., and then blame it on left-wing groups.

In the end, the fascists complained that the people who hired and directed them weren't even interested in the true philosophy of fascism, just in getting a sometimes restive citizenry to cling more tightly to the infantilizing skirts of government. Check it out for yourself here. and here.

Of course, without a sense of history, skepticism and critical thinking go out the window. If we were the people we once were, the ones who overthrew a tyranny, we might have taken more notice of what the two suspects' mother told Russia Today, as reported by Business Insider:

"He [the older brother] was controlled by the FBI, like for three, five years,” she said. “They knew what my son was doing, they knew what actions and what sites on the Internet he was going [to], they used to come…and talk to me…they were telling me that he was really a serious leader and they were afraid of him."

"How could this happen?…They were controlling every step of him, and they are telling today that this is a terrorist attack," she added.

A spokesperson for the FBI told Business Insider Friday that the agency would be putting out a statement "shortly" regarding its previous contact with either Dzhokhar or his now apparently dead older brother, Tamerian Tsarnaev . The spokesperson would not confirm or deny that the agency had had any previous contact.

You can read and watch for yourself here. Does anyone else find it strange that, as Mother Jones reported in 2011, "With three exceptions, all of the high-profile domestic terror plots of the last decade were actually FBI stings"?

In a 2012 New York Times opinion piece entitled "Terror Plots, Hatched by the FBI", Judge Colleen McMahon is quoted as characterizing a would-be synagogue bomber thusly: "Only the government could have made a 'terrorist' out of Mr. {James} Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope."

The usual MO of the FBI, according to court transcripts ,is to place one of its thousands of informants– a retired Egyptian military officer, say, or a criminal looking to cut a deal– close to a hapless young man who may or may not have expressed anger in some public forum concerning U.S. behavior toward Muslims.

Sometimes the informant will show his mark pictures of torture at Abu Ghraib, to get their dander up. In a process that can take years, the informant will maneuver, cajole and brainwash the pawn into participation in some sort of plot.

Usually the FBI will provide everything that a first-time terrorist could want: maps, a driver, dummy explosives, you name it. Now totally entrapped, all the patsy has to do is set the phony charge or push the button, and out come the cuffs.

Did the FBI take one of its fake-bomb entrapments too far in Boston? If the older of the two brother-suspects was under complete "control" by the FBI, or at least under surveillance, how did he manage to do what he allegedly did?

Or is there a far worse scenario to consider, one where the obvious outcome of the past week's events– a more fearful, pliant citizenry; ever more "security" in ever more areas of our lives, and an even larger portion of our state and federal tax dollars diverted toward the everlasting war on terror–was welcomed and indeed encouraged by the very security forces we pay to protect us?

I'll let you do your own research into the verified reports of "exercises" or "drills" occurring before and during the marathon. Related to that is the unusually heavy security, including the possible presence of a truly bizarre mercenary/training group called Craft International at the finish line.

In photos released on 4chan.org, the logo of "The Craft" — a demonic-looking skull — can be seen on the hat of a man carrying a large bag. The Craft's Web site describes the design as including a cross hair over the right eye socket in the shape of the Templar cross to "symbolize the faith" of their founder, former Seal Team 3 member Chris Kyle, known as "the most lethal sniper in U.S. military history". Craft's motto is "Violence does solve problems". (Kyle was killed in February, purportedly by a fellow vet at a shooting range in Texas.)

The events of April 19 saw an entire city cowed into submission, the latest in an infamous string of highly suspicious attacks and outright abuses of government power that have occurred on that very date in years past.

Does the lockdown of Greater Boston indicate the onset of a new and terrifying stage of American quiescence, the solidifying of a herd-like mentality better suited to farm animals than citizens of an allegedly free country? How will we ever reclaim that revolutionary spirit, now that we need it more than ever, and gather the courage to open our doors and look out on the world around us with bold, unblinkered eyes?



The Mainstream Church: Yesterday and Today


Chuck Frank


What was it about the America’s early church that was so different from today's mainstream church? During the mid 1700’s the church was fully “involved” in supporting a country and a people who were being oppressed by a tyrannical king and a British government that knew no bounds and was making the life of the colonists unbearable. Besides taxation without representation, the grievances were many while pastors and their members were also being persecuted as England’s “state” religion was then being ushered into the fray. Therefore, the ministers were not only praying fervently to God on behalf of the oppression of the thirteen colonies, they were also being very zealous and active in bringing their own congregations into the forefront of a political struggle and standoffwithGreatBritain. AndwhenthreatscamedownfromtheCrown, pastors were not fearful of losing their “tax exempt status” for they had decided, in faith, to take on a firm political stance that would become the key in a major push towards the birth of A FREE NATION. Yet sadly, this will not be found in a high school or college text book, for America’s real history has been censored.

As far back as 1770, ministers who had already begun speaking out, once again stepped to the forefront, boldly denouncing the British abuse of power in the famous Boston Massacre. In fact, the Massachusetts House of Representatives even ordered that the Rev. Samuel Cooke’s sermon on the subject be printed and distributed.

Now then, let’s fast forward. It is very clear that though we have many enemies in the world who may even threaten us, however the real issue in America today is very different. We have a secular enemy( i.e., Homeland Security) from within, but on this note where is the church and a sermon on that subject.? I have only heard one such sermon in my lifetime a few years back by the pastor of Glad Tidings in Yuba City. It was without a doubt one of the finest sermons I have ever heard which touched upon the true Christian foundation of our country.

Focusing further, a law enforcement culture and Marxist thought in government presently challenges a majority of consensus among the people. It also dramatically sidesteps the Constitution, while arrogantly taking exception to God’s Word, the Holy Bible, the church, and our inalienable rights, all of which were key foundational elements of the country since its very beginning.

For years, government has been influenced by favored special interests while also authoring draconian and misrepresented legislation. In addition, hostile bureaucracies were created, while abominable court decisions were recklessly allowed to fly into the face of the American people and worse still, those decisions were responsible for the 55,772,015 atrocities of unborn children since 1973. (LifeNews.com.)

Now it is up to the mainstream church to take their stand, less the entire country be lost to a rebellious and desensitized generation bent on undermining Godly direction and Biblical principles. Consequently, we have major cities degenerating into gang-infested war zones, “over taxation” without representation, home bible studies being closed down, 30,000 spy drones estimated to be in the air by 2020, GPS everywhere, satellite black boxes in all of the new cars, SWAT teams and family farms being raided, hundreds of FEMA camps built all over the nation and I might ask for whom? Then there is the national ID Card which is still on the drawing board, along with government spyware to hack and track your cellphone and watch your every move. If that isn’t enough, any American citizen can now be detained indefinitely without a court hearing. Just say goodbye to the U.S. Constitution and if this isn’t treason, then what is? This is Homeland Insecurity. Sadly it is the tip of the iceberg, and all the while there is a free people inside the Titanic sipping wine but the ship is already sinking. Does anybody know what time it is? Just ask the lady with the diamond watch…life boat anybody?

I must ask a very serious question. If the church during pre-American Revolution times was experiencing the same type of radical police state intrusiveness along with a government and a large segment of the population that lacked either moral standards, accountability, or credibility, what would the early church have done, just remain silent? Certainly not! Now is the time for the mainstream church to either act within the framework of God’s will and save the country or the nation shall surely fall to a ruthless, “politically incorrect” generation.

Let’s reverse gears. When God saw the oppression of the Hebrew slaves in Egypt he sent Moses to deliver them. When God saw the great city of Nineveh that had crossed over into moral decay he sent Jonah the prophet and the city repented and was spared. Yet, what will it take for America to wake up to the realty that it needs to turn to God; another Detroit riot, a Watts, a Waco, or a Kent State, or will the final implementation of martial law finally bring America to its senses? By then, it will be far too late! The people as well as the church can no longer afford to be passive for the very foundation of America is vanishing at light speed. And what is the endgame? It has been incorrectly called, “the major transformation of America”, because the nation is about to implode into a million pieces while government adds fuel to the major meltdown.

In summary, modern accounts of our history often ignore the extensive leadership role pastors had in the building of America. Early historians, however, proudly heralded the direct influence of our clergy in not only addressing salvation but also forging America into the great and free nation it became. America’s pastors were closely involved in every aspect of securing what became our country’s civil and religious liberties.” We can all most assuredly learn something from the character of these courageous pastors from the years gone by. Shouldn’t all of us try to go forward with the same faith and works that was evident in these beautiful souls that were determined to raise up a standard to the world and for the glory of God? 

Department of Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

Just a little reminder…


Department of Defense Instruction 

Number 3025.21

Department of Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies




Federal Register

12Apr13 – Vol.78, No.71

Department of Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies


Gun Control Survey: 11 Key Lessons from Officers’ Perspectives




Doug Wyllie, PoliceOne Editor in Chief 10-43: All Units…
with Doug Wyllie, PoliceOne Editor in Chief


PoliceOne's Gun Control Survey: 11 key lessons from officers' perspectives

Never before has such a comprehensive survey of law enforcement officers’ opinions on gun control, gun violence, and gun rights been conducted


Gun Survey 2013

In March, PoliceOne conducted the most comprehensive survey ever of American law enforcement officers’ opinions on the topic gripping the nation's attention in recent weeks: gun control.

More than 15,000 verified law enforcement professionals took part in the survey, which aimed to bring together the thoughts and opinions of the only professional group devoted to limiting and defeating gun violence as part of their sworn responsibility.

Totaling just shy of 30 questions, the survey allowed officers across the United States to share their perspectives on issues spanning from gun control and gun violence to gun rights.

Top Line Takeaways
Breaking down the results, it's important to note that 70 percent of respondents are field-level law enforcers — those who are face-to-face in the fight against violent crime on a daily basis — not office-bound, non-sworn administrators or perpetually-campaigning elected officials.

1.) Virtually all respondents (95 percent) say that a federal ban on manufacture and sale of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds would not reduce violent crime.

2.) The majority of respondents — 71 percent — say a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of some semi-automatics would have no effect on reducing violent crime. However, more than 20 percent say any ban would actually have a negative effect on reducing violent crime. Just over 7 percent took the opposite stance, saying they believe a ban would have a moderate to significant effect.  

3.) About 85 percent of officers say the passage of the White House’s currently proposed legislation would have a zero or negative effect on their safety, with just over 10 percent saying it would have a moderate or significantly positive effect.

4.) Seventy percent of respondents say they have a favorable or very favorable opinion of some law enforcement leaders’ public statements that they would not enforce more restrictive gun laws in their jurisdictions. Similarly, more than 61 percent said they would refuse to enforce such laws if they themselves were Chief or Sheriff.

5.) More than 28 percent of officers say having more permissive concealed carry policies for civilians would help most in preventing large scale shootings in public, followed by more aggressive institutionalization for mentally ill persons (about 19 percent) and more armed guards/paid security personnel (about 15 percent). See enlarged image

6.) The overwhelming majority (almost 90 percent) of officers believe that casualties would be decreased if armed citizens were present at the onset of an active-shooter incident.

7.) More than 80 percent of respondents support arming school teachers and administrators who willingly volunteer to train with firearms and carry one in the course of the job.

8.) More than four in five respondents (81 percent) say that gun-buyback programs are ineffective in reducing gun violence.

9.) More than half of respondents feel that increased punishment for obviously illegal gun sales could have a positive impact on reducing gun violence.

10.) When asked whether citizens should be required to complete a safety training class before being allowed to buy a gun, about 43 percent of officers say it should not be required. About 42 percent say it should be required for all weapons, with the remainder favoring training classes for certain weapons. 

11.) While some officers say gun violence in the United States stems from violent movies and video games (14 percent), early release and short sentencing for violent offenders (14 percent) and poor identification/treatments of mentally-ill individuals (10 percent), the majority (38 percent) blame a decline in parenting and family values.

Bottom Line Conclusions
Quite clearly, the majority of officers polled oppose the theories brought forth by gun-control advocates who claim that proposed restrictions on weapon capabilities and production would reduce crime.

In fact, many officers responding to this survey seem to feel that those controls will negatively affect their ability to fight violent criminals.

Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe, police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility.

The officers patrolling America’s streets have a deeply-vested interest — and perhaps the most relevant interest — in making sure that decisions related to controlling, monitoring, restricting, as well as supporting and/or prohibiting an armed populace are wise and effective. With this survey, their voice has been heard.

HOTT Podcast for 3 April 2013 – Robert Tuccio Interview

Hello everyone,

Please take a listen to today’s newly recorded podcast where Robert Houghton interviews Robert Tuccio, author of The PreTribulation Rapture Exposed!

Mr. Tuccio shares his inspiration to write the book and explains his motivation for clearing up details on where some churches go wrong.

Support Mr. Tuccio by purchasing his book here!


VNS and CAJI/IS Exclusive – 23Mar13 – The Modern Man: The CFR and the Control of America – Pt. 1

Veritas News Service


CAJI/IS Exclusive

The Modern Man:

The CFR and the Control of America

Part 1


By Mike Visockis

     What is wrong with our society today? How did we as a people ever let ourselves be so controlled by a gradually increasing threat to our freedoms, families, and our constitutionally protected rights? These are the questions we have on our minds, whether we realize it or not. This network of control is so complete that trying to explain the fact that it exists today is next to impossible. This is made possible by using the tools of political propaganda, political correctness, behavioral modification, COINTELPRO infiltration, and the attempted control of every facet of our lives. The best example of this control is the one exerted by the Council on Foreign Relations that Dan Smoot detailed in his book The Invisible Government.

     In his Farewell Address George Washington on September 17, 1796, warned us about allowing foreign influence and alliances in American affairs and about America's neutrality stance.  He promoted free exchange of “travel and commerce, ideas and culture.”  Fast forward to April 1917 when Woodrow Wilson's war message speech went back on his campaign promise of neutrality of 1916 and entered the country into World War I. 

     “Save the world … create a world federation of nations” was the catch phrase Wilson used in a May 27, 1916 speech to the League to Enforce Peace where he endorsed the House version of world government.  Colonel Edward Mandel House was the political adviser for Wilson, shaped his foreign policy, ran the State Department, and was influential to the international banking families in the United States and Europe.  In September 1916, the President’s Brain Trust made a “charter for world government.”  The Trust was made up of “150 college professors, students, lawyers, economists, writers, and others,” including Allan Dulles and John Foster Dulles.  This is where the idea for the League of Nations came from.  However, the conference in Paris went bad and the Constitutionalists in the U.S. Senate found out about the plans and vowed not to pass the treaty.  A stark contrast from the U.S. Senators we have today.

     The U.S.A. group returned from Paris to form the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921.  Described as a “… force in policy for America – to replace the traditional ‘negative’ foreign policy … old-world politics.”  The negative force they are talking about here is any foreign policy that is isolationist, anti-war, and against their aims.  But it was not until 1927 that the CFR really took off because they received funding from the Rockefellers.  After the Rockefellers sent their money, the Carnegie and Ford Foundations followed suit with more funds.  http://www.cfr.org/about/

     In 1929 they got their first headquarters in New York City at the Harold Pratt House, 58 East 68th Street.  In 1939 the CFR gained in its popularity and membership in the U.S. State Department.  Then in 1939, as World War II started, the CFR offered its services in security, armaments, economic and financial, political problems, territorial problems, and the Rockefellers funded the plans through foundation grants.  In San Francisco in 1945 forty members of the U.S. Delegation to the U.N. wrote the U.N. Charter.  Those in attendance were John Foster Dulles, Adali Stevenson, A. Rockefeller, Nelson A. Rockefeller, and others.  By 1945 the CFR had all but taken over the State Dept.  (Smoot, p. 10)

     “The ultimate aim of the Council on Foreign Relations … Is the same as the ultimate aim of international communism: to create a one world socialist system and make the United States an official part of it.”

     As an example of the political games CFR members’ play, Presidential Advisor Julius Holmes wanted to buy and sell marine ships and surplus, but Congressional law prohibited the selling to foreign countries.  In August 1947 he formed a corporation, bought eight tankers; everything was sold to foreign countries.  This equipment was then used to ship goods and equipment from Russia to Romania, and then to China for the North Korean war to be used against American troops. By September 1948 Holmes returned to the U.S. State Dept. with about $1 million in profit. 

     A Senate subcommittee in 1952 said that the operation was “morally wrong” and was criminally indicted in 1954, but was later dismissed.  By 1961 John F. Kennedy was President and he nominated Holmes to the same position.  Senator Prescott Bush [Grandfather to George W. Bush] speaking on the nomination said Holmes was “an innocent victim of sharp operators.”  Holmes never made restitution to the U.S. government for the laws he broke.  He was questioned in 1961 when he said that there was nothing wrong with what he did. 

     Holmes and many others believe in situational ethics.  This means the ends justify the means.  This is a good example to show that what he was doing was illegal, unethical, and not what the American people wanted as illustrated by the fact of the original outrage of him being nominated to an ambassadorship.  Holmes was not the only person to come up with this idea of skirting the law–organizations like the CFR take their ideas, collaborate, and guide their members to their own agendas.  We are told that is just how politics works.  The question is what are their agendas? This is actually easy to figure out if you know what you’re looking for.  All you have to do is look at their deeds, what they produce, or simply what they really do.  This is sometimes hard to figure out, but you have to dig deeper than the outward appearance and facades of people and their organizations. 

     Holmes continued to say that he would do it again, and no congressional committee ever investigated further.  The Senators he was working with all said that he did nothing wrong as well.  That was a bold face lie because it was illegal.  Here it is also obvious that these Senators believed in situation ethics as well.  Holmes Ambassador U.S. Senate debates, (Congressional Record, pp. 6385-6, 4/27/1961, pp. 6668-9, 5/3/1961, pp. 6982-95, 5/8/1961) and the vote was 75-21 in favor of his nomination.  Senator Prescott Bush [grandfather to George W. Bush] proceeded to praise Holmes by saying, “Julius Holmes is the noblest man.”  (p. 12)

1961 CFR members: John F. Kennedy [technically not an official member], Dean Rusk, Adali Stevenson, Harriman, Mcloy, Allen Dulles (DCI), Galbraith (Fed.), Edward R. Murrow, Holmes, Schlesinger, George W. Ball, McGeorge Bundy. 

     CFR publications like Foreign Affairs had circulation of 43,000 and it was very influential in 1961.  The CFR corporate income in that same year came from foundation grants of Ford and Carnegie, the subscriptions from Foreign Affairs, and membership dues.  Businesses that contributed to the CFR in the 1960-1 year: AT&T, Armco, Brown Brothers Harriman [currently the oldest private bank in the U.S.], Chase Manhattan [Rockefeller owned], Chicago Bridge and Iron, Continental Oil, I.I. DuPont, First National City Bank, Ford Motor Company, General Dynamics, General Motors, Gillette, Gulf Oil [one of the Seven Sisters which was owned by Rockefeller and is now Chevron.], Halliburton [once chaired and partially owned by Dick Chaney], Heinz, IBM, I.T.T., Kellogg, Loeb, Merck, Mobil, New York Times, Ohio Oil, Otis elevators, Owens-Corning, Pan-Am, Pfizer, RCA, Rand Corp., San Jacinto Oil, Sinclair Oil, Singer, Standard Oil [Rockefeller owned], Texaco, Texas Gulf Sulfur, Texas Instruments, Tidewater Oil, Time, Inc., and U.S. Steel.  What did they get in return?  Profits advantages, less competition, and Congressional breaks and funding helped these companies prosper very well for many years, and some are operating even today.  (p. 37) For a more modern and comprehensive list see the CFR Annual Reports that go back to 1999 here: http://www.cfr.org/about/annual_report/

     In turn for corporate funding, the CFR provides consultation, access to their library, copies of all their publications, off-the-record dinners, and two annual copies of the records. 

(p. 43-44). In 1958-1959, the U.S. held roundtable meetings with Premier Castro, Mikoyan, and Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold.  Castro spoke on “Cuba and the United States.”  The League of Nations, and even the United Nations today, gave legitimacy to barbaric Communist countries and their governments, and gave away more seats to them percentage wise compared to the United States.  One of the speakers at the meeting was the mayor of Communist East Berlin.  (p. 20)

     There have been 30 official CFR organizations in use across the country, including:  Albuquerque, Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Indianapolis, Los Angeles, Nashville, Philadelphia, Portland, Tucson, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, and St. Louis.  We will discuss these “Committees on Foreign Relations” in a later section.  To see more about these groups see: http://www.acfr.org/about.htm 

     In the aftermath of World War II the CFR expanded their influence over the U.S. Government, for example, by taking credit for the protection of Greenland under the Monroe Doctrine as FDR ran for his third term.  However, the Monroe Doctrine was never meant for this kind of an application.  The ideas like these come from the CFR and trickle down from the members and their respective positions and organizations and these are the people who are in leadership and advisory positions who guide the other people in their respective organizations.

     The CFR helped the U.S. during and after World War II to shape the policies of the U.S. Government and its foreign relations.  These CFR policies, from 1921 to the present day, have redistributed the wealth of the U.S. in gold to foreign countries and governments, and have funded the industrial buildup of them as well.  We have seen this more recently by the transfer of jobs overseas to countries like China that have devastated the U.S. manufacturing industry, by eliminating millions of jobs in the process. 

     One may ask why this information doesn’t make the local news or mainstream book publishing houses.  The answer to that is simple.  Many books are actually out there, they are just not as popular and are harder to find.  The other reason is the fact that there is a large web of control of media editors and anchors like Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, and Diane Sawyer, of U.S. Congressmen, Presidents, Military leaders, financial institutions, Federal Reserve System, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, U.N. Ambassadors, 9/11 Commission members, U.S. Cabinet officials, judiciary, union leaders, religious leaders like Rick Warren and Richard D. Land.  It is this web of control that guides the direction of everything in its reach to their aims.  The question is what are their aims and goals?  This may seem hard to find out, but actually it really comes down to basic logic. 

     Just like there are rules of gravity, there are certain things that can happen and some that are impossible.  Forensic scientists use these rules all the time to match up evidence like fingerprints.  The evidence that we can discover like a suspenseful murder mystery can be found by simply looking at what the CFR members do, especially their leaders.  By looking at their publications, writings, books, opinions, and decisions we see what they really believe.  As we have seen from the paragraph above, the CFR has no problem with planning and implementing the elimination of millions of jobs in the U.S.

     It has been their plan to lessen the world markets of production until the U.S. no longer dominates.  “The entwining of American affairs — economic, political, cultural, social, educational, and even religious – with those of other nations until the United States will no longer have an independent policy … until we cannot return to our traditional foreign policy of maintaining national independence, nor to free private capitalism as an economic system.” This is what the CFR believed then, and does today, and has plans of action for.

Works Cited:

Smoot, Dan. The Invisible Government, 1962.








The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare

The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence; Tallinn, Estonia.

The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, written at the invitation of the Centre by an independent ‘International Group of Experts’, is the result of a three-year effort to examine how extant international law norms apply to this ‘new’ form of warfare. The Tallinn Manual pays particular attention to the jus ad bellum, the international law governing the resort to force by States as an instrument of their national policy, and the jus in bello, the international law regulating the conduct of armed conflict (also labelled the law of war, the law of armed conflict, or international humanitarian law). Related bodies of international law, such as the law of State responsibility and the law of the sea, are dealt within the context of these topics.

The Tallinn Manual is not an official document, but instead an expression of opinions of a group of independent experts acting solely in their personal capacity. It does not represent the views of the Centre, our Sponsoring Nations, or NATO. It is also not meant to reflect NATO doctrine.
Nor does it reflect the position of any organization or State represented by observers.

The Tallinn Manual is available in both paper and electronic copies from Cambridge University Press (http://www.cambridge.org/tallinnmanual).
We also recommend reading Professor Michael N. Schmitt’s article “International Law in Cyberspace: The Koh Speech and Tallinn Manual Juxtaposed”,
published in the Harvard International Law Journal (http://www.harvardilj.org/2012/12/online-articles-online_54_schmitt/).


Gun Ownership vs. Homicides

Untitled attachment 00025

Controlling The Minds Of A Nation – A Prison Without Walls

A Prison without Walls
by Michael Allen



An Illusory Progression Towards an Incarcerated Society


For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

— II Peter 2:18-20

You have all heard at one time or another during the past couple decades about how our nation is being transformed into what is being called a police state, and you may have recognized that our personal privacy and individual freedoms are now diminishing at a startling rate but are unable to put your finger directly on the cause of the problem. Well, if you are one of these individuals, it is not too late to open your eyes and become awakened to the facts and still be able to reach out and help wake up your friends and neighbors before it’s too late. Before running out and yelling that the red-coats are coming, although that’s not far from the truth, there is some basic information that must be attained so that you can come across to your associates as one being somewhat knowledgeable in what you are talking about; believe me, this isn’t always the easiest thing to do, as there are vast amounts of bullshit coming at us from all directions at the same time!

In my series of articles, from what you are now reading a part of, I am attempting to convey to you various aspects of a diabolically-orchestrated master plan that is unfolding upon us right now. I’m sure many of you may be convinced that it’s too late to change the course of these events, but might I remind you… when a point in time comes and you concede, in your own mind, to what your abilities may manifest, you have just lost the war and will inevitably become enslaved to yourself and to those that suppress you. You must remain steadfast in what your objectives are and to what your perceptions of the outcome will be. You must be able to visualize success in order to attain it. You must be willing to sacrifice everything in order to preserve freedom for our future generations. If we don’t make a stand together soon, we may never again find the opportunity. We are truly living in an age of deception, and without action to counter what is taking place you will be deceived. Your very soul may be lost forever as what we face is unequivocally of a diabolical nature and your very soul is found in the balance.

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

— I Corinthians 6:9-11

Over the past couple decades the population at large is being indoctrinated or otherwise simply brainwashed into accepting draconian legislation designed to give the sense of providing a safer and more secure system to live by. Those who are willing to trade away some of our rights and freedoms deserve neither.  The masses of the population stay glued to their televisions and suck in all the bullshit as if they were vacuums. They believe the false statistics and lies portraying a consensus that believes certain individual rights and freedoms must be sacrificed to obtain protection; they follow along just to keep step with this falsely created majority just as the masters of this world have predicted. YOU ARE BEING LED TO THE SLAUGHTER.

This part of the series of articles will deal with various aspects of several surveillance technologies and control mechanisms that are being used against us – this includes everyone. What we can expect to see transpire in the near future is the total surveillance of all aspects of our lives. Transportation, communication, hospitalization, medication, and just about anything else you wish to add to the list will be monitored and processed for conformity to predefined profiles that have been established by a handful of power-hungry perverts that hide in shadows pulling the strings of the wannabe leaders. Nearly every thought will be monitored, kind of like George Orwell’s book 1984, except his book gravely underestimates the reality of what is transpiring today.

There are so many aspects of this surveillance scenario that are totally alarming on their own account, but in actuality they are merely components of a much greater diabolical orchestration of complete control, a depiction of total enslavement. The average person’s perception of what’s taking form around them is gravely underestimated and misconstrued; their understanding of reality has become warped and twisted by their own continuation of believing all the lies passed down from the government by counterfeit truths and ambiguous interpretations of news accounts, laws, and various other forms of propaganda being presented and canvassed through the controlled Main Stream Media.

The only item that remains a stumbling block for the NEW WORLD ORDER to totally take over our lives and abolish the Constitution is the fact that Americans are still in possession of firearms. These NWO control freaks are deathly afraid of the American people and believe that we must be placed under total surveillance; this has nothing to do with our safety, but is in reality to protect the NWO system from the people! Talk about paranoia! They know that we will stand up and resist their tyrannical takeover of this nation. Those who are in control have to disarm this nation in order to bring their Totalitarian Socialist Dictatorship into power. Without the 2nd Amendment, we will have lost all means of defense to protect ourselves against these bastards and will have to kiss our freedoms and our dreams good-bye; without our freedom there will be nothing left.

The bigger picture that we must take notice of and ADDRESS is one of having the total population placed into an arrangement of unprecedented social

confinement without actual incarcerations. Although actual incarcerations will continue to exist, this will act to galvanize the sensation that you are still free on the outside and to conceal the elimination of the undesirables. The once thought-of Prison-Industrial Complex is rapidly giving birth to a new societal interpretation, one that is fueled by the repulsive greed from bureaucratic control freaks in government; this I will dub as the Prison-National Complex, where the citizens become the prisoners and the prisons become our surroundings. This might sound quite absurd and even a bit like science fiction to those that still have their heads stuck in the sand, detached from reality, believing everything that is propagandized from their televisions as being normal and everything will be just fine.

Maybe if you take a closer look at some of the major components being set in place, you can begin to pull your heads out of the sand and begin to understand that the overall picture that I’m presenting is not just a figment of my imagination, but is indeed a vivid truth having many well verifiable facts. This BEAST system is here right now, and will undoubtedly become increasingly more draconian, antagonistically pervasive, and diabolically malevolent beyond your wildest nightmares. This is the system depicted in the Book of Revelation found in the Holy Bible and all those that refuse to become part of this system will inevitably be tracked down, imprisoned in Re- Education Centers (FEMA CAMPS) and undergo an indoctrination program, then re-introduced into society upon their total submission to the system, or be ELIMINATED. Many people will never reach the re-education centers as any form of resistance will be met with a high probability of lethal aggression imposed by the enforcers of this BEAST system: the police and military. This is indeed a dismal picture of the future and without understanding the nature of what is taking place, we would be doomed to be deceived and face eternal hell.

There are several major components that comprise this societal prison that we are facing. I will be examining only a couple that are extraordinary associated with this system. Although these items can be expanded far beyond my brief introductory association, what I present will have an uncanny controlling aspect on our abilities to express our individuality towards freedom and even to live our lives as we have grown accustomed. These items are extremely intertwined to great extents covering all conceivable levels.

Let’s take a look at the first of these components that is being sprawled out before us in the news lately, namely Drones (UAS’s – Unmanned Aerial Systems). For those that still are unsure what drones are, let me present to you a brief description:

DRONE: Drone or remotely piloted vehicle, a pilotless craft guided by remote control. Aircraft, ships, and land vehicles can be designed or outfitted as drones, although underwater vessels—both piloted and pilotless—are usually called submersibles. Small, relatively inexpensive military drones are used as targets in combat practice, while high- performance models may be used in hazardous reconnaissance missions and to carry and launch missiles against enemy targets without exposing pilots and their far more expensive aircraft-to-antiaircraft fire. Depending on the mission, drones can be equipped with armament, radar, video cameras, lasers, or sensors for chemical or biological weapons. Guidance of the drone can originate from an airplane, a ship, a ground station, or a satellite link. Building upon the successful use of drones in the Second Persian Gulf War, the Homeland Security Department is planning to use unmanned aircraft to track drug smugglers, illegal immigrants, and terrorists along the U.S. borders. Contemplated civilian uses include replacing stationary video cameras and sensors for traffic control, for monitoring crops, to help fight forest fires, and for atmospheric research. [1]


This should open your eyes as to what drones are and should also clue you in on some of their capabilities. These drones are not only going to be used for surveillance purposes, but assist in the apprehension of PATRIOTS and CHRISTIANS and also for assassinations of political dissidents along with anyone who is labeled as a terrorist. You may question my usage of the term “assassination,” so just for a reminder, all of the drone strikes that you hear about in the news taking place throughout the world are all considered assassinations. To further your learning experience, the following will prove the intent for the use of drones against Americans during actions such as civil unrest and anything else that the government deems appropriate, even things such as an outstanding traffic ticket. PAY ATTENTION.

A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing? That’s right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet. While the Obama administration continues its Bush-blaming for the economy, it is mega-morphing Bush policy in covert ops overseas, which was, according to the Post, “to kill U.S. citizens abroad if strong evidence existed that an American was involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests.”

Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations. A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, confessed before Congress: “We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that.” If you are wondering who the “we” are to whom Adm. Blair refers, they are Smith, Wesson and the White House. [2]

AND furthermore, take into consideration that President Obama signed the 2012 NDAA that allows for indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. The NDAA’s dangerous detention provisions would authorize the president, and all future presidents, to order the military to pick up and indefinitely imprison people captured anywhere in the world.

On the contrary, the domestic use of drones has already begun, under the terms of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act, which Obama signed into law February 14. This requires the FAA to permit nationwide use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) by September 2015. Dozens of police departments and even private corporations have applied for permits to use drones.

The military use of drones has begun along the US-Mexico border, and it is only a matter of time before these are armed and used to fire missiles at targets who will be identified as “terrorists,” “people smugglers,” “drug cartels” and the like.

From there, it is a short step to the use of drone-fired missiles in domestic law enforcement operations, and then more widely against the growth of social and political opposition to the policies of the American ruling elite. [3]

Although there are legitimate uses for drones, the actual intended uses are to provide an automated surveillance and ARMED DETERRENT system. As always, the actual intended use will be kept in the shadows so the public can be continually misled into believing some bogus story about keeping them safer and more secure. So as NOT to alarm anyone, these portrayed uses will be presented to the American people to justify their legal use around the US. An article in The Washington Times, titled “FAA official: No armed drones in U.S.” [4], is a good example of the propaganda being used and clearly shows that this is the precise tactic. Just the article’s headline alone should raise eyebrows; it should be well known by now that the opposite of what our government agencies’ propagandists tell us, is actuality what is intended.

…opens U.S. airspace to thousands of these unmanned aircraft. The drones come in just about any size you want – as large as a passenger plane – or as small as a hummingbird. “There’s no stopping this technology,” said Peter Singer, a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and perhaps the country’s foremost authority on drones. “Anybody who thinks they can put this genie back in the box – that’s silliness.” Singer watched them dramatically alter the American battlefield overseas, and says they’re about to become the next big thing at home. [5]

Although it is projected that by 2020 there will be 30,000 drones in the nation’s skies [6], I feel that this number is under-stated and the actual number will be much higher. The FAA has released a list of drone authorizations that have been mapped and includes law enforcement agencies and universities in the US, in both the public and private sectors. The following map insert shows the current listing; this is supposed to be updated as new applicants file their request. [7]


Click for Interactive Map

FAA Releases New Drone List—Is Your Town on the Map?

From looking at the map above, it would be easy to make the assumption that metropolitan areas are being targeted first and this is NOT correct. Some of the places on the map are actually quite small and are not cities at all, but are universities and colleges, as such Cornell University located in the Village of Aurora, N.Y. There are other areas that are not even on the map and have been using UAS’s for at least 3-4 years as I have witnessed these flying along the Seneca River in Seneca and Cayuga Counties in New York State while fishing. These were being operated by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and the NYS Police and were looking for patches of marijuana growing near the river.

Another important aspect pertaining to drones is the imaging capabilities available for surveillance and tracking purposes. It has been previously published in many media outlets about the 1.8 gigapixel camera developed by DARPA and installed in the Boeing-built A160 Hummingbird Vertical-Take- Off-and-Landing Unmanned Aerial Systems, or VTOL-UAS. These crafts are flown at an altitude of 20,000 feet and have the ability to scan high-resolution video images covering 25 square miles of ground surface. ARGUS sensor suite software from DARPA will be able to capture the wide-area video surveillance and provide live video streaming at around 1 million terabytes per day (5,000 hours of HD footage). [8][9]

The Autonomous Real-time Ground Ubiquitous Surveillance-Imaging System (ARGUS-IS) program is developing a real-time, high-resolution, wide-area video surveillance system that provides the warfighter a minimum of 65 VGA video windows across the field of view. Each video window is electronically steerable independent of the others, and can either provide continuous imagery of a fixed area on the ground or be designated to automatically keep a specified target (dismount or vehicle) in the window. [10]

Many airborne electro-optical sensor systems in the field today provide “soda straw” (i.e., narrow field-of-view) coverage on the ground at their highest resolution resulting in only a few thousand square meters visibility. Automated multi-target detection and tracking methods for those systems are often capable of tracking vehicles, but do not enable high performance tracking of all targets of interest, such as dismounted Soldiers. In addition, current sensor systems are typically controlled by one operator, with the rest of the military force “slaved” to that single operator’s perspective. TAILWIND will address these deficiencies by developing a persistent day/night surveillance capability and providing real-time image products to multiple users. The TAILWIND system will meet the rigorous size, weight, and power (SWaP) constraints of a small UAV. During a mission, operators on the ground will receive their own custom image products (alerts, tracks, 3D models, and video summarizations) with a handheld terminal that connects the user to the TAILWIND system. TAILWIND will enable the persistent surveillance mission for company level operations. [11]

It’s easy to see that the ability to watch over us day and night is upon us as a thief in the night! The imaging capabilities mentioned above are several years old as of this writing, but from the available information obtained through my research, this is still the best available… you agree, right? I really don’t think so; the rate that technology is going seems to be exponential and what is now known by the public has been around for years in secret projects. Just imagine combining this imaging technology with the ability to see through walls… or in this case, through rooftops. There are several projects currently being developed that have proven results utilizing the Through-The-Wall (TTW) technologies using WiFi [12], cellphones [13][14], and microwaves [15]. I have only scratched the surface here and might cover these in more depth in later articles as more factual data becomes available. ARE YOU STARTING TO GET IT?

While I’m still on the surveillance issues, let’s dig into another important component in our societal prison and look at the various surveillance aspects found within your personal pocket companion, your personal dilemma called the cellphone. Most of you are becoming so dependent upon the convenience of your cellphone that many of you probably even sleep with it, or know someone who does. When the time comes to go underground, what will you do? Are you able to discard the cellphone and resort to some other method of communication? Sneaking a cellphone into your Alice-pack will undoubtedly place you and whoever might be near you in a situation that should be avoided at all cost.

There are methods to intercept and track the locations of a cellphone, with or without GPS capabilities. One method used for non-GPS cellphones is called “Triggerfish” and utilizes scanning of the cellphone’s emissions by a mobile unit (Wireless Intercept and Tracking Team) [16]. Another method commonly used for GPS-capable cellphones is called “Stingray,” an IMSI catcher, and can get your cellphone’s GPS location even if your phone is NOT being used by mimicking a cell tower and tricks your cellphone device into connecting to it. This method tracks your cellphone in real time and can pinpoint your location within two meters and can also capture all communications including text messaging. [17]

A Stingray—which could potentially be beamed into all the houses in one neighborhood looking for a particular signal—is the digital version of the pre-Revolutionary war practice of British soldiers going door-to- door, searching Americans’ homes without rationale or suspicion, let alone judicial approval. The Fourth Amendment was enacted to prevent these general fishing expeditions. As the Supreme Court has explained, a warrant requires probable cause for all places searched, and is supposed to detail the scope of the search to ensure “nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.”

But if uninformed courts approve the unregulated use of Stingrays, they are essentially allowing the government to enter into the home via a cellular signal at law enforcement’s discretion and rummage at will without any supervision. The government can’t simply use technology to upend centuries of Constitutional law to conduct a search they would be prevented from doing physically. [18]

Much of your cellphone data is readily available to all law enforcement agencies with minimal effort; just submit a request and your provider will PROVIDE the data and send the bill. Companies such as Verizon charge $50 for five days of text messages and various other fees according to their price list stated in a letter from Verizon to the Honorable Edward J. Markey, US House of Representatives. [19]

It doesn’t stop here. Cellphone surveillance software can also be purchased by virtually any person wishing to buy it from numerous software vendors to track and monitor your children, your employees, or even your spouse. It’s easy and pricing starts at about $.50 per day. Some companies claim that NO ONE will ever know they are being monitored. You can remotely activate the phone’s microphone to listen live to the phone surroundings. You can view data from anywhere by using the Internet. You can even view every call, text message, email, video, or picture on the phone. You can even activate the camera and view the phone’s surroundings. [20][21]

Did you know that every picture taken from your cellphone contains metadata; the “who,” “what,” “where,” “when,” and “how” that goes everywhere the picture goes! Unless you remove or change this metadata, anyone with basic knowledge of digital imagery can extract the data and retrieve such information as to the GPS location where the picture was taken, when the picture was taken, what type of camera was used, the date and time the picture was taken, and a whole lot more.

Abraham Lincoln always said that if he only had six hours to cut down a tree, he would spend his first four sharpening his axe. Those in the security community often relate this statement to the information gathering and reconnaissance phases of breaking into another system. In the reconnaissance phase a potential intruder will spend a great deal of time learning everything they can about their target before they attempt any sort of exploitation because the information gathered here is often crucial in order to find weaknesses in a system or its user. In this article I’m going to discuss the importance of metadata as it relates to reconnaissance. I’ll cover what it is, how it’s stored, and how attackers can extract it to find out more about you or your network. Finally, I’ll provide some defensive tips to help you ensure that you aren’t leaking the wrong kinds of information out to the world via file metadata. [22]

Another issue that needs to be noted is that an ultra-fast WiFi network is being considered nationwide by the government that will allow free access for everyone. There is much debate from various Internet sources whether or not this information is true. Looking at this a little closer, we can see that it’s actually already in place. Through a handful of the top cellular providers such as AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile, it’s easy to connect to the Internet from just about any place in the country. I’ve noticed that while sitting at a red light near places like McDonalds, Staples, Office Depot, Lowes, Home Depot, Best Buy, and many others, that my cellphone tries to connect to their WiFi networks automatically. This gets really annoying and interferes with any Internet connection that is already established on my cellphone. I’m sure other people have experienced this as well. It’s just a matter of time that this problem will need to be addressed and will most likely usher in a predetermined solution: that being the free nationwide WiFi that was mentioned above. Doesn’t this sound like a PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION scenario and the Introduction to INTERNET TWO?

Having a nationwide WiFi network doesn’t sound like such a bad idea up front, but as we know, there are two sides to every coin. The other side of this coin contains the mobility component of our BEAST system. Taking a look around, you can notice the use of traffic cameras up and down most all interstate highways, main thoroughfares near any metropolitan areas, and at most major intersections; don’t get these confused with typical red-light cameras that snap your picture during traffic infractions. These surveillance cameras not only monitor traffic conditions, but what you are not being told: they also provide surveillance of the selected motorist. Most of these surveillance cameras are connected to WiFi networks. With the national WiFi, the surveillance can be achieved continuously between adjacent geographical location zones. In addition to being able to visually track a subject, combine the GPS systems already installed in most cars and in most cellphones into this visual scenario and you get a very accurate real-time picture that can be virtually re-created, analyzed, and profiled very quickly. Do you see the potential for this ultra-fast national WiFi network to be integrated into the automated response from law enforcement agencies or even from UAS’s?

This depicted WiFi surveillance network is now being used in many places across the nation. You probably already know about Facial Recognition software and License Plate Scanners and other such items as these have been around for a long time now so I will spare you from the redundant rhetoric by not including these here; I’m just noting that these are also already tied into this WiFi BEAST surveillance system. Here is an excerpt from an article about a surveillance system called “TrapWire” that you will undoubtedly find quite interesting as well as to present a much bigger view of the system.

TrapWire is a massive and technologically advanced surveillance system that has the capacity to keep nearly the entire population of this country under the watchful eye of government 24 hours a day. Using this network of cameras and other surveillance tools, the federal government is rapidly constructing an impenetrable, inescapable theater of surveillance, most of which is going unnoticed by Americans and unreported by the mainstream media.

Unlike other elements of the central government’s cybersurveillance program, word about TrapWire was not leaked by Obama administration insiders. The details of this nearly unbelievable surveillance scheme were made public by WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy group founded by Julian Assange. The TrapWire story percolated from the millions of e-mails from the Austin, Texas-based private intelligence- gathering firm Stratfor, published this year by WikiLeaks. Covering correspondence from mid-2004 to 2011, these documents expose Stratfor’s “web of informers, pay-off structure, payment-laundering techniques and psychological methods.”

This coterie of Stratfor co-conspirators is apparently angry about the leaks, considering that the WikiLeaks servers have been under near- constant Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks since the TrapWire revelations began attracting the notice of alternative journalists. Some outlets report that the cyberattacks are being carried out by agents of the American intelligence community determined to prevent the full depth of this scandal from being explored by reporters.

Exactly what is TrapWire? According to one description of the program, from Russia Today:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         “Former senior intelligence officials have created a detailed surveillance system more accurate than modern facial recognition technology — and have installed it across the US under the radar of most Americans, according to emails hacked by Anonymous.”

Every few seconds, data picked up at surveillance points in major cities and landmarks across the United States are recorded digitally on the spot, then encrypted and instantaneously delivered to a fortified central database center at an undisclosed location to be aggregated with other intelligence. [23]

All of this so far has presented to you an unmistakably grim picture of what is to be used against anyone that is determined by BIG BROTHER as being anti-New World Order: those of us that are steadfast in loving freedom, those maintaining their GOD-given rights, those that will undoubtedly refuse to be implanted with an RFID chip, and those that refuse to accept the NWO religion, Bahaism.

The tracking and monitoring system is nearly complete, much of what is now active. Even though I have only scratched the surface in presenting this control system to you, I have left out so many aspects that play as much a part to this system as any of the other parts and will include them in future articles. I do have ONE more very important component that will prove to be a keystone between you and your own abilities to survive in the impending diabolical melodrama soon to be played out between the forces of DARKNESS and that of LIGHT. This little component is known as RFID and will be found virtually everywhere… literally.

World’s Smallest RFID



At ISSCC 2007, Hitachi, Ltd. and Renesas Technology Corp. have delivered a lecture (lecture number 26.6) about their micro RFID tag (wireless tag) IC measuring only 0.05 x 0.05 x 0.005 mm. This is as small as 2/27 their “next-generation mu-chip” measuring 0.15 x 0.15 x 0.0075 mm announced at the preceding ISSCC in 2006. This IC was manufactured using 90-nm CMOS technology using SOI substrates. It features a three-layer metal wiring layer and a 21 x 32 μm memory chip capable of recording 128-bit data. It is attached to a separately- provided external antenna when used, and communicates with the RFID tag reader via the 2.45 GHz band. Maximum communication range is 300 mm. Mitsuo Usami, Senior Chief Researcher at Hitachi’s Central Research Laboratory who delivered the lecture, said its power when transmitting data is “slightly less than 1 mW.”

Like the preceding 0.15-mm square model, this RFID tag IC also features electrodes on both surfaces for antenna connection. It is because, considering the IC’s micro size, it will cost too much if manufacturers have to distinguish which side is which when they bond it to the antenna. Therefore, Hitachi and Renesas made the chip have electrodes on both sides, so manufacturers no longer need to adjust its direction and location when bonding it. It assumes to be mounted on antennas with around 6-cm length, like those used for current RFID tags. “ACF” (anisotropic conductive film) is used to bond an antenna and the IC. [24]

These micro RFID chips do have GPS capabilities!


What happens once you have been identified as being possibly a defiant individual possessing the characteristics that DHS sets forth as being a threat to the draconian regulators of the NWO? You will inevitably be rounded up of course. If you are one of the lucky ones that can manage to evade the system, you will be tracked down and targeted. Your bank accounts will probably be confiscated and the only means to purchase items such as ammo, food, fuel, water, etc. will have to be accomplished by means requiring an alternative method of transaction such as bartering, use of gold or silver coinage, or through a network of reliable friends and family members who are willing to help (this would make them chargeable of “AID and ABET” and may carry a very stiff sentence so don’t depend on anyone else for your own survival), and you will be on a future NO-TRAVEL-LIST.


If you use a credit or debit card for your purchases, every purchase you made with your handy plastic card has been recorded in your master-file. Items such as the date, amount, location, time, and much more data has already been accumulating under this master-file and can present a very accurate picture of your living and buying habits; this can also be recreated in real-time virtual 3D imagery along with your network of friends and family or other acquaintances that you may be associated with. It’s just a matter of time and you will be given the ultimatum: Get your RFID implant, go to a FEMA Re-education Camp, or be eliminated.


My choice is: God before everything. GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH; a fair warning you are entitled, peace be with you.


And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.


— Revelation 13:11-18



God bless each and every one of you.



1 TheFreeDictionary by Farlex. “Drone or remotely piloted vehicle.”

2 Chuck Norris 2010. “Obama’s US Assassination Program? “A Shortlist of . U.S. Citizens specifically Targeted for Killing”?” Global Research, Centre for Research on Globalization.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-s-us- assassination-program-a-shortlist-of-u-s-citizens-specifically-targeted-for-killing/20779

3 Patrick Martin 2013. “Obama Administration Pushes Ahead with Drone . Killings.” Global Research, Centre for Research on Globalization.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-administration-pushes-ahead-with- drone-killings/5313056

4 Ben Wolfgang 2013. “FAA official: No armed drones in U.S.” The . Washington Time.

5 CBS News.

6 S. Smithson 2013. “Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress.” The Washington Times.

7 Electronic Frontier Foundation 2013.

View EFF’s updated Map of Domestic Drone Authorizations in a larger window. (Google Maps)

8 Nicole Lee 2013. “DARPA’s 1.8-gigapixel cam touts surveillance from . 20,000 feet (video)”. Engadget.


10 Neal Gompa 2011. “New spy drone has 1.8 gigapixel camera.” EXTREME TECH.

11. Fred Schnarre DARPA Program Manager. “TACTICAL AIRCRAFT TO INCREASE LONG WAVE INFRARED NIGHTTIME DETECTION (TAILWIND)” http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/I2O/Programs/Tactical_Aircraft_to_Increase_Long_Wave_Infrared_Nighttime_Detection_(TAILWIND).aspx

12. Elinor Mills 2012. “Surveillance device uses Wi-Fi to see through walls” Cnet.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57496724-83/surveillance-device- uses-wi-fi-to-see-through-walls/

13. Sonia Paul 2012. “Will Cellphones Be Able to See Through Walls? New Research Says Yes [VIDEO]” Mashable.

14. Kimm Fesenmaier 2012. “Can Your Smartphone See Through Walls? Engineers Make Tiny, Low-Cost, Terahertz Imager Chip”. Science Daily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121210120408.htm

15. FOX News 2011. “MIT Tech Helps U.S. Soldiers See Through Concrete Walls.” FOX News.

16. Wikipedia. “Triggerfish (surveillance).”

17. Darlene Storm 2012. “Fighting unconstitutional stingray phone surveillance that tracks innocent people.” ComputerWorld.

18. Hanni Fakhoury 2012. “Stingrays: The Biggest Technological Threat to Cell Phone Privacy You Don’t Know About.” Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/stingrays-biggest-unknown- technological-threat-cell-phone-privacy

19. A Letter from William B Patersen, General Counsel for Verizon to Representative Edward Markey. http://markey.house.gov/sites/markey.house.gov/files/documents/Verizon%20Wireless%20Response%20to%20Rep.%20Markey.pdf

20. Mobistealth 2013.

21. mSpy 2013.

22. Chris Sanders 2011. “Enumerating Metadata.” WindowsSecurity.com

23. Joe Wolverton, II, J.D. 2012. “TrapWire Training Courses Reveal Possible Purpose for its Creation.” The New American.
For more information on TrapWire, visit their website: https://trapwire.com/

24. Tetsuo Nozawa, Nikkei Electronics 2007. “Hitachi Achieves 0.05-mm Square Super Micro RFID Tag, ‘Further Size Reductions in Mind.’” Tech-On Tech & Industry Analysis from Asia.


Copyright © 2013 Michael Allen. All rights reserved.