Brother Bart’s Conspiracy Corner
There is an account in the scriptures where a zealous priest, thinking he was doing the work of God, persecuted true believers who he sincerely considered to be a heretical threat to divine truth. (You see, you can be sincere, and be sincerely wrong.) Then he had a conversion of thought, which led to a conversion of actions. The leader of the group he was oppressing confronted him, and showed him that his beliefs were the exact opposite of the truth. Willingly,though humbly, the priest completely changed his mind, heart and actions, one hundred percent, in regard to his entire life’s work and perception. Why? Because he was a seeker of the truth over tradition. The battle for the truth is inevitably a battle between reality and tradition (or traditional, that is conditional, thinking).
My life story in regard to the moon landings is exactly the same type of conversion. My father was in the Air Force, so I grew up around the latest aviation and technology. I loved it! Though I was only four years of age at the time of the alleged moon landings in 1969, quietly asleep in bed, my father, as a celebrated military officer, was given a VIP package of commemorative photographs of the event, which he gave to me as a cherished present. From the age of about four to fourteen, these pictures covered an entire “sacred” wall in my bedroom. It was a shrine (like a religion) to the intellectual prowess of humankind (which indeed it did turn out to be!) I saw these images, which were a representation of the alleged “glorious” American moon landings, every day, three hundred sixty-five days a year, for ten years. This means I saw theses images propagating the desired belief in their authenticity, three thousand six hundred fifty times before I even considered the possibility that they were misrepresentations of reality . . . That’s a lot of brainwashing!
Fortunately, at the age of fourteen, I saw an enlightened television program featuring an interview with William Kaysing, a NASA contractor during the Apollo “moon” missions. He asserted quite confidently, from first hand eyewitness accounts, that the flights were staged to increase the prestige of the United States during the height of the Cold War and the pit of domestic discontentment. After watching the program, I went to my enshrined bedroom wall of infamy and looked, for the first time, with new eyes, at theses surprisingly telling pictures. Sure enough, just like the man said, stunning evidence of photographic anomalies were hidden in plain sight! (They say this is the very best place to hind something investigators are looking for!) I just had to have “eyes that see”, after all a famous prophet notably said that most people “have eyes that do not see, and ears that do nothear”.
I equate this with a salt shaker always being placed in the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the left side, for ten years. If your spouse inadvertently moves it to the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the right side . . . you don’t see it, even though it is right there in front of your eyes! . . . There you stand, with the cabinet door wide open, the salt shaker right in front of you only inches away (though on the right side of the shelf rather than the left, where you were trained not to look), and you do not see it! . . . There I was, looking at the same pictures of the alleged moon landings over and over again for a full decade, yet not seeing quite obvious inconsistencies and abnormalities that would quickly give away the deceptive criminality of the event, if only I would look beyond my programmed response!
Like everybody else, I was so conditioned by the media to see what they wanted me to see, that it took real effort on my part to discernsuccinctly fiction from fact, plus I had no mentor to point out my error. (Read my article “Introduction” at the top of “Brother Bart’s Conspiracy Corner” for further explanation on media manipulation.) As Stanly Kubrick’s last film was entitled “Eyes Wide Shut!”, this was my and the populous’ simplistic error. For example, at the top of this article you see what is the most published and well known photograph of the alleged moon landings, yet there are at least five telltale signs in this picture that give away the deception that are completely and repeatedly overlooked due to people seeing what they are conditioned to see. First of all, what most people don’t notice is the ease at which the “astronaut” has his left arm bent at ninety degrees. If he were really in outer space on a heavenly body without an atmosphere, then the spacesuit would have to be dramatically pressurized with compressed air, which it is obviously not due to the numerous wrinkles in the fabric and the ease at which they hold their arm bent. (The spacesuit should be puffed up like the Michelin Man.) Secondly, if you look to the right of the actor, about waist high, just above the faint cross (+), you can see where the background changes from a faint grey color to a darker grey shading. (In earlier pictures, which NASA later corrected, the color actually changed even more dramatically from grey to blue.) This is where the real landscape and the false landscape (a large photograph on a the wall) converge!
In order to better get away with the deception of this fake backdrop, they have done two things. First, they rolled the real landscape slightly uphill before the wall began, so as to not make the distinction between the two as obvious. Secondly, and even more clever, the movie set they built was actually circular. In order to discern the line between the fake backdrop and the real foreground you must look at a slightly upward angle to the right from the “astronaut’s” waist and perceive that they are standing near the wall of a set that is circular. Thirdly, in the reflective visor of the actor (which conveniently conceals who is really in the spacesuit), you can notice that there are actually three degrees of shadow. The darkest is of the person’s full body shadow and the shadow of the “lunar lander”. The second is the faintest area of no shadow in the top left of the visor, just below the black horizon. The third, medium shadow, actually encompasses the greatest area, as it is the shadow of the fake backdrop wall itself, casting a noticeably large angular shadow in the foreground in front of the person in the spacesuit, as the top of it was cut with less artistic esthetics because it was beyond the camera’s view and contains three noticeable ninety degree turns. It is not discernable in the limited area of the photograph itself, yet is perceivable by “those that see” in the visor’s expanded reflection.
Fourthly, as even the designer of the camera which took the picture admitted in his interview on “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon” (the link of which is at end of this article), the “astronaut’s” shadow indicates that “the sun” (or rather the light to represent it) is behind them, yet they are nevertheless also lit with supplemental electrical light from the front, none of which NASA admits they took on their mission, as they claimed that sunlight was more than ample.
Finally, just above and past the one o’clock position of the face visor, you see a hint of a small straight white line going up, yet it is inadvertently cut off. Because the person is really standing on earth (in a film studio) and not on the moon’s much lighter gravity, they were being supported by cables from the ceiling so they would not topple over from the heavy backpack which was designed for one sixth the gravity. Though the cables were undoubtedly painted black in an effort to conceal them in the black “outer space” background, they must have shown up anyway. In their rush to conceal the cables, NASA’s “photo lab” just laid a piece of black masking on top of them, just above the height of the backpack. Unfortunately for them, this cut off the radio transmitting antenna which should be sticking out of this part of the backpack as it does in all other photographs, yet the antenna is nowhere to be found! How could they then communicate with people on earth a quarter million miles away without an antenna? Oops!
In a way, like naïve Adam and Eve, you can’t blame people for initially being deceived, after all, which is a more pleasant realm to live in, one in which your country or world continually lies about science, integrity and spending, or one in which your country or world is scientifically unsurpassed, honorable and financially honest? Naturally, people almost always seem to see the latter because this is the kind of realm they would rather live in.
Personally, if I had cancer, I would want to know about it rather than pretending that I didn’t have it. (Obviously though, some people prefer being lied to with pleasantries.) While pretending that I wasn’t diseased would temporarily pacify my emotions, it would also unabatedly spread the disease, potentially to fatality, because I ignored it. On the other hand, while finding out that you have cancer is quite a downer, you can at least plan according to reality instead of fantasy, and perhaps actually accomplish more with this information, albeit seemingly depressing information, knowing that you have limited opportunity to change your life for the better. Fortunately again, at the age of twenty-four, I had become a filmmaker, and happened to be editing a film one day for the very producer of the show I had seen as a fourteen year old ten years earlier about the moon landing fraud! “Do you remember that guy you had on your show who said the moon landings were fake?” I asked, “What was his name. I’d like to talk with him.” The rest is history.
When I ask leading “intellectuals” why they will not even briefly consider just the possibility of a moon landing fraud, they say “No one would do such a thing.” (That is to say, no one would be that audaciously wicked.) My argument is that in a world full of genocide, murder, rape, theft, mutilations and molestations, is merely lying about a scientific accomplishment so farfetched? After all, haven’t Nobel laureates in the past been forced to give back their medals for plagiarism and deceit? Yes, they have!
I went from being the biggest fan of the moon missions to eventually becoming the most outspoken critic because I was open minded and willing to be wrong when the evidence presented itself to the contrary of my first opinion, even if that evidence was unpredicted, unprecedented and very depressing. I was not totally brainwashed by false criminalistic “patriotism” to the point that I was incapable of deprogramming myself from relentless, from the cradle, deceptive government propaganda. These type of people who vehemently appose the admission of a cover-up regarding the Apollo “moon” landings, with foaming rabid mouths and their polluted brains infected by party-line corporate college degrees, have openly admitted, time and time again, that if firsthand eyewitness Neil Armstrong himself had went on national television and confessed to the cover-up, they would still believe that the moon landings were real! Who then is mentally deficient as they claim the conspiracy theorists are? These people will not even consider for one second, even the possibility, that the alleged manned moon missions were a cold war deception to inflate the appearance of American military superiority, as well as pacify rampant disgruntled domestic revolt, so how can the opinions of such close-minded people be trusted in the first place? The supposed manned moon missions are a religion to them and a false one at that. (See 2nd Thessalonians 2: 9-12)
Hitler, the master of deception, said that it was actually easier to get away with a gigantic lie than a small one, because small lies are so common and anticipated, and that no one would expect the audacity of a grand deception. This is precisely the psychological tactic that was used in precipitating and maintaining the monumental, yet simple lie of the moon landings. Never before in the entire history of the world did such a historical event have absolutely no independent press coverage. Why do investigators overlook this most telling piece of evidence? Only three government employee eyewitnesses to the “greatest event in history”? Whatever completely government controlled photographs and images were given to the press were blindly assumed to be authenticated by the “credible” Nixon administration. It is like giving a whining child cake for dinner to appease them and then expecting them to argue with you demanding broccoli instead!
The Vietnam War during the alleged moon missions was destroying the country from within by its divisiveness and civil protests. Nixon repeatedly said so himself, thinking that this mounting public discontent might actually lead to real anarchy, rebellion and the disintegration of the government, not to mention his precious egotistical cushy job! A unifying pep rally of a successful moon landing was just what the American patient needed! Do you really think that Nixon was going to risk killing three national “heroes” on live worldwide television during his presidency when simply failing to rescue kidnapped hostages would ruin you for life as it did president Carter? How could he absolutely guarantee a successful moon mission? To stage it! Not to mention that it was technologically impossible at the time to begin with. In fact, according to NASA contractor William Kaysing, who worked for six years on the Apollo missions, a classified interdepartmental memo, which he personally read and proofed, estimated the likelihood of a successful manned mission on the first attempt at a mere one in ten thousand chance.
Some assume that if the Soviet Union or Chinese intelligence agencies found out that the American moon landings were fraudulent they would “spill the beans” to the rest of the world. This is simply not true, and again, thinking only one step farther than programmed to do reveals the truth. If wars are created for the profiteering of the “Military Industrial Complex”, as many forward thinking people including president Eisenhower now realize, then “adversaries” of America are merelyimaginary, created for profitable ends by the billionaires pulling the strings behind the scenes, who have been working toward a one world government for the last half a century anyway. As such, the Soviet Union and China are, in fact, in-league with the United States government. This being the case, these overseas entities would not bring the truth of such an American scandal into the light to injure their co-conspirator brother. Any “bad blood” the United States appears to have with foreign powers is merely staged for the very purpose of keeping their complicity a secret.
Even if these two “super-powers” were actual enemies of America, they still would not expose the truth about the moon missions. For example, if I had a picture of the president with a prostitute, would it be more profitable for me to give it away free to the press corps, or to blackmail him year after year with ever increasing tolls until the day he died? If such countries really were enemies of America and had proof of the moon landing fraud, it would serve their interests much more to keep such knowledge to themselves and blackmail America, administration after administration, to get the behind-the-scenes negotiations to favor them, whether it regarded trade, arms, debt, or anything else they so desired.
There were, in fact, no “independent” tracking stations for the Apollo missions. The only entities that had such capability were the United State’s own government agencies (who were complicit in the cover-up) and the aforementioned countries, who profited from keeping the secret. Additionally, NASA launched the “Tetra-A” satellite shortly before the Apollo missions to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that their ground crews could rehearse the “moon landings” during their many simulations. Conveniently, it was purported that the Tetra-A satellite accidently burned up in the earth’s atmosphere just before the first mission, that way the government satellite could secretly still be in service, performing the same simulation function during the “real” flights. Furthermore, retired ground crew members recently acknowledged that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a “real” and a “simulated” moon mission.
From Wikipedia regarding The Apollo Fraud:
At first (and only) glance, these appear to be relevant arguments, yet each one is, surprisingly, most easily and unconditionally refuted with only a modicum amount of further investigation beyond conditioned interpretation. First of all, it has recently come to light through “whistling blowing” intelligence employees that “Wikipedia” is a mainstream, establishment supported, parasitical organism used rampantly for propaganda purposes by multiple government agencies such as the NSA, as they can anonymously post intelligent sounding pro-government thesis to the masses, often deliberately contradicting and smugly belittling more truthful “conspiracy theories” of very real crimes of the authorities in power, whose express purpose of these writings is to cover-up and deflect attention away from their own illegal and unholy behavior. (See the Sleuth Journal article on this topic at the end of this writing.) When they use words like “empirical evidence is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur” . . . It not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument that is so much losing ground that they have to resort to the administration in power tactic that if you don’t agree with them you are somehow deficient in intelligence.
It was proven in 1962 that a laser can be bounced and calibrated off of the moon without a man made reflector thereon simply due to the reflectivity of the lunar surface. Secondly, Russia put a manmade mirror on the moon’s surface during the time of the Apollo missions for this same claimed purpose, using instead an un-manned probe that would not have to suffer the biological ravages of lethal space radiation. (See the March 1959 issue, Volume 200, Number 3, of the magazine “Scientific American”, article entitled “Radiation Belts Around the Earth”, to see how deadly and impenetrable space radiation is beyond the safety of low earth orbit where the space station currently resides.) Thirdly, seeing how all of these lasers have their data computer controlled, it would only take one computer hacker, if they so desired, to manipulate the data shown on a scientist’s viewing monitor, which they wrongly assume is the gospel truth. (This was precisely the case at “mission control” during the “moon” missions, where dozens of computer “operators”, who actually just read the preprogrammed data screens like news anchors who do not write their own words, and openly admitted, after the fact, that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a flight simulation and a “real” flight.)
To say that additional photographs from the criminal NASA are evidence that “prove” the moon landings were real is laughable. They already faked high resolution, full body pictures of an “astronaut” standing right on the “moon’s surface” more than forty years ago, so what is it to fake additional pictures, with four decades better technology, of such simple things such as tiny shadows or scratches on lunar satellite photographs that are supposed to be from human foot tracks or Apollo lunar landers? These diehard believers are just seeing what they want to see, like a naïve spouse of a cheating partner, accepting the fox’s evidence that they didn’t steal a chicken.
Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout industry who contributed to the missions, who allegedly would have had to have kept the secret. Again, seemingly a good argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought and investigation. Do you really think the CIA was going to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were actually faking the moon landings? Do we really think the CIA is that stupid to tell everyone? Just like a pyramid of power in any business, what the employee, the manager and the regional manager knows about the business’ actual agenda, is completely different than what the CEO at the top knows. Remember, there were only three people (“trusted” government employees) who were actually there at the time. As you will see in my film “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (the link follows this article), they were indeed on the rocket, they did launch into earth orbit (to attain zero gravity photography), they did splash down in the ocean (to add to the realism), yet the rest, beyond earth orbit, was completely contrived, like a masterful illusionist, by satellite data manipulation, complete media control, and professional movie sets. After all, what is easier to do, actually build a rocket and travel to another planet, or simply make a movie about it?
Some of the best evidence supporting the fraud is the fact that in 1994, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, three hundred sixty-five miles, one third higher than they normally flew, they were asked to descend to a lower altitude by mission control due to lethal space radiation they encountered by approaching too close to the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which don’t even begin until one thousand miles altitude. That is to say, they were six hundred thirty-five miles away from radiation that was so intense that they reported they could see the radiation with their eyes closed as sparks of light hitting the retinas of their shaded eyes. When this happened, CNN inadvertently reported this fact by saying, “The radiation belt surrounding earth is more dangerous than previously believed.” Apparently not a single journalist on the entire planet figured out, except for myself, that this statement totally contradicts the authenticity of the moon landings. Here’s why:
The only time in world history human beings are said to have traveled through the twenty-five thousand mile thick radiation field called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which unbeknownst to most surrounds earth starting at an altitude of one thousand miles, is during the alleged moon missions. Why is it then that astronauts some six hundred thirty-five miles away from this radiation, twenty-five years later, know more about it than the Apollo astronauts who claimed they were in the middle of it twelve times to the moon and back? Remember, the radiation is now “more dangerous than previously believed”. What is “previously believed” if not based on the reports from the “experts” of the radiation, the Apollo crews, who were allegedly the only ones in all of history to have traveled through the radiation twelve times to the moon and back, with no ill effects and no reports of any kind of the visible sparks of radiation being seen as later reported. Again, how can people six hundred thirty-five miles away from something know more about it than people who were allegedly in the middle of it? Of course, this is simplynot possible. What does this mean? It means that the people who claimed to have previously been inside the radiation field lied about being there. Of course too, if they never went through the Van Allen Radiation Belt as this contradictory report reveals, then they certainly could not have gone to the moon either, which the transversing of this radiation would require! Why does no one connect the dots with this very revealing information except me? Because the dots are horrific and would break the spirit of the entire American nation if they knew the truth!
In fact, when I discovered absolute proof (actual, on camera evidence) that the Apollo astronauts never left earth orbit (contained in a previously unseen unedited NASA reel which was never broadcast) and showed this videotape to a news director at NBC, he turned pale white, practically fainted and exclaimed, “Oh, my God! It looks like we didn’t go to the moon!” “I know”, I said, “What do we do?” The man who held the betterment of America in his hand thought for a long while, slowly sunk into his chair, and then eventually “chickened out”. He said, “I can not air this with a clear conscious. It will cause a civil war. I will not be responsible for that.” While I disagree that the public knowing the truth about the moon missions would cause a civil war, they would probably demand governmental reform and start investigating other matters of corruption and deception. Naturally, criminals would rather not get caught and preserve their way of life that reform would inevitably dismantle.
Oddly enough, when Bush Jr. was president, he went on national television and proclaimed that “The United States will return to the moon as a logical first step to Mars and beyond”. Did no one besides me notice that if they really already went to the moon six times, why would they need to do a “first” step over again for the seventh time? He was even so bold as to go on to say that “First we will need to learn how to protect the astronauts from lethal space radiation.” Am I the only one curious enough to ask, “Why not do it the same way that worked so good the first time they went to the moon?”
In August of 2009 it was reported, albeit as a news oddity (and it certainly was) that a “moon rock” given to the president of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself in 1969 was opened thirty years later from its hermetically sealed container by a curious museum curator after he had watched “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”. After examination, the rock was verified to actually be a deceptively authentic looking piece of petrified wood instead! Yet again, not a single journalist, except for myself, asked the question, “If the moon rocks are fraudulent, what about the moon missions?”
If more people would only view with an open, deprogrammed mind, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, which contains this newly discovered video evidence of the moon landing fraud, they would see with their own eyes recently uncovered unedited behind-the-scenes outtakes of false photography of the recently deceased Neil Armstrong during his historic flight. The scene contained therein has never been broadcast to the public. In it, Armstrong is using a one foot diameter model of the earth, from low earth orbit, to create the illusion for the television viewers, that he and his crew are half way to the moon, when they are, in fact, still in earth orbit. This is, in my opinion, absolute proof that, though they were on the rocket in low earth orbit, the crew never went any further due to lethal space radiation.
This footage is even dated by NASA’s own computer clock as having taken place two days into Armstrong’s flight, when he is supposed to be half way to the moon, yet he and his crew are clearly shown (in these newly discovered unedited outtakes of the broadcast) to be still in earth orbit and falsifying the television photography to deceive the viewing public of their real location. The CIA is even heard on a private, third audio channel, prompting Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay, so as to appear much farther from the earth than he and his crew actually were. Jump ahead to time 32:02 if you do not wish to view the entire forty seven minute documentary and only see the newly discovered unedited out-takes of Neil Armstrong falsifying mission photography during the his historic and now infamous mission.
The extremely simple fact is this: After Columbus traveled to the new world, everyone traveled to the new world. After Lewis and Clark traveled to the American west, everyone traveled to the American west. After the Wright brothers accomplished powered flight, everyone else did immediately thereafter. Soon it will be five decades since America allegedly had men leisurely playing golf on the moon in complete safety with 1960′s technology. (More computing power is found today in a ten dollar watch than was in the entire Apollo program!) For some reason, no one, from any nation on earth, has been able to go to the moon and survive, not even once, with five decades more advanced technology . . . Why? . . . There is only one possible answer . . . It is soooooooo simple . . . Because it can not be done . . . even today!
If all the scientists from all the nations on earth can not go to the moontoday with all the newer technology that the 21st century has to offer, it simply means, and it can not mean anything else, that America did not go to the moon in the 1960′s. It is sooooo obvious to anyone with an open mind who does not have a religious attachment to the event.
Just as Hitler’s children, if he had any, would never see dear old papa as anything but a benevolent patriarch, these mired intellectuals will never admit that their enamored “scientific” community and “glorious” government can be just as corrupt as pedophile priest.
1) “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”
2) “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon”
3) Fake Moon Rock Found in Museum
4) NSA Uses Wikipedia and Other Social Media for Propaganda