The 2016 Presidential Election of the United States of America has attracted a significant amount of attention from Americans and the world alike with daily, regularly vehement, opinions being expressed in respect to the candidates by the public and media at large. This article aims to consider the election at an almost preliminary level; the nature of voting, in particular the infrastructure and the question as to whether or not it ultimately makes any difference who Americans vote for on November 8th.
Electronic voting has been used in the United States for many years and currently is used exclusively by five states (Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana, New Jersey and South Carolina) alongside most of the remaining states using a combination of both paper and electronic voting . The electronic equipment that is used for voting is owned and operated by private institutions, some of which include (or have included): Diebold, Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Sequoia and Hart Interactive . The systems are of a proprietary nature, with the source code and other aspects of the systems being closed and vendors being involved in all aspects from designing to maintaining the systems, ultimately resulting in great difficulty when it comes to the public attempting to scrutinize the technology . Although, there have been many cases of computer experts raising concerns in respect to the technology, two notable examples as featured on a prominent documentary on this subject entitled ‘Hacking Democracy’ include Dr. Herbert Hugh Thompson hacking into the GEMS (Global Election Management System) central tabulator and modifying votes and Harri Hustri hacking the memory card used to store votes; both cases resulted in the ability to manipulate the vote count as was desired by the hacker . Another example was a computer programmer who under oath swore that he had written a prototype for a congressman which would alter the results of an election .
The significant power associated with these companies is illustrated by the fact that in 2010, Premier voting systems were used in “over 1,400 jurisdictions in 33 states and serve near 28 million American voters .” Concern has been expressed regarding how the companies conduct themselves with election officials and the agendas of key people involved within the organizations. As an example, a quote attributed to the chief executive of the company Diebold notes he is “committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year .” Another example includes Chuck Hagel, who ran for a senate seat in Nebraska. Prior to the election, the polls were so close that it was noted an outcome could not be predicted. Hagel ultimately won the election by fifteen points. It has been discovered that Hagel, up until two weeks prior to announcing his candidacy, was chairman of ES&S whose computer systems were responsible for counting his own votes for the election. Furthermore, the company’s founder was Hagel’s campaign treasurer. Hagel’s financial ties to ES&S were never disclosed and although a request was made to recount the votes, a state law requiring the votes be recounted using the same mechanism that was used initially deemed it pointless . A number of election officials also end up working for the electronic voting machine companies and sign on as lobbyists. Entities, such as The Election Center, who defend electronic voting, take money from electronic voting companies and don’t disclose how much .
If one delves into most elections that use electronic voting, there seems to regularly be discrepancies and questions raised. From recent elections  to perhaps the most well known controversy in the 2004 Presidential Election . The issue also isn’t specific to the United States, but can also be identified overseas . If one desires to investigate how the machines are tested, and whether or not any of the noted issues are formally documented, they are denied communication . Furthermore, not all electronic voting machines leave a paper trail of the vote and as Harri Hustri demonstrated in ‘Hacking Democracy’ it’s possible to manipulate the physical evidence if the machine does emit a print out .
It seems clear that citizens should be concerned with the proliferation of these machines and it could be confidently argued that electronic voting machines, especially in their current state, are not fit for use in elections with the obvious solution being a complete adoption of paper voting and the immediate ceasing of use of these machines for formal voting purposes.
King, E. (2016) How the U.S. Ended up with today’s paper ballots. Available at: http://time.com/4305508/paper-ballot-history/ (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Simon, J. and Baiman, R. (no date) The 2004 Presidential Election: Who Won The Popular Vote? An Examination of the Comparative Validity of Exit Poll and Vote Count Data. Available at: http://freepress.org/images/departments/PopularVotePaper181_1.pdf (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Zeller, T. (2004) Ready or not, electronic voting goes national. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/19/politics/campaign/ready-or-not-electronic-voting-goes-national.html (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Hacking Democracy (2006) Directed by Simon Ardizzone, Russell Michaels UK
truthstream (2006) Rigged USA elections exposed. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Staff, B. (2010) Dominion voting systems, Inc. Acquires premier election solutions assets from ES&S. Available at: http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/10/05/b292647/dominion-voting-systems-inc-acquires-premier-election-solutions-assets-#/ixzz15sGvPDXa (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Smyth, J.C. (2003) Voting machine controversy. Available at: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0828-08.htm (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Collier, V., Gumpert, R., Solnit, R., Nolan, R., Oates, J.C., Kirn, W., Sullivan, R. and Neason, A. (2016) Harper’s magazine – part 3. Available at: http://harpers.org/archive/2012/11/how-to-rig-an-election/3/ (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
On the voting machine makers’ tab (2004) Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/12/opinion/on-the-voting-machine-makers-tab.html (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Hatlem, D.J. (2016) Hillary Clinton versus Bernie Sanders: Taking election fraud allegations seriously (part 1). Available at: http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/09/hillary-clinton-versus-bernie-sanders-taking-election-fraud-allegations-seriously-part-1/ (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Fitrakis, B. and Wasserman, H. (2004) Diebold’s political machine. Available at: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2004/03/diebolds-political-machine (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
New South Wales Attacks Researchers Who Found Internet Voting Vulnerabilities (2015) Available at: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/04/new-south-wales-attacks-researchers-who-warned-internet-voting-vulnerabilities (Accessed: 13 October 2016).
Harris, B., Allen, D. and Alexander, L. (2004) ‘Who’s Beholden to Whom?’, in Black box voting: Ballot tampering in the 21st century. Renton, WA: Talion Publishing, p. 52.
There are numerous folks throughout the years who have worked behind the scenes as well to keep the broadcast going, let’s remember some of them as well because many have since passed on while others have just gotten older. Many of these taken from his scrapbook, some wrote Veritas, some you’ve heard on the broacast and some were just nice…
Also, what would today be without a research offer for you to improve your understanding of the issues at hand…
We’ve posted the first hour of Ralph’s presentation from HOTT’s skills and research conference in 2010 to our youtube channel.
Check it out below, and be sure to donate for a set if you’re interested in a copy. If you prefer, you may watch it directly on youtube here.
You may donate to receive this 5 DVD Set, details here, by writing to HOTT, PO Box 940, Eagar, AZ, 85925. Send $45 cash, or make your check or money order payable to “Veritas”.
If you must use a credit card you may purchase it through our partner, The Quality Canadian, here. All product orders are shipped directly from HOTT.
THIS SET SHIPS FROM THE USA WITH FIRST SHIPMENTS MAILING ON OCTOBER 12th, 2015
The Hour of the Time is pleased to announce the release of a new 5 DVD set for your research libraries. This informative work contains the complete presentation that Ralph Epperson showcased at our 2010 Hour of the Time Skills and Research Conference in Arizona. When we invited Ralph to speak at our conference he compiled a brand new presentation solely for our attendees. We felt very fortunate that Ralph would put this large effort into the project and decided it had to be filmed so that we could offer our entire listenership the opportunity to donate to receive a copy of this work.
The entire presentation is over 7 hours in length and has been compiled onto 4 DVDs. Ralph covers an extensive set of topics including the following :
Baseball caps, bras and long hair – what can they tell us about a person?
Dan Brown and the DaVinci Code
The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail
Did Jesus really exist?
Is the shroud of Turin Real?
Who pays for wars?
Mormon and Masonic parallels
Symbols on the dollar bill
Why didn’t the New World Order come to exist in 2000 as so many had thought might happen?
What is a conspiracy?
Significance of the number 13
Shriners and the Fez
Manly P Hall
32 and 33
Symbology of the 5 pointed star
The single secret inside the Masonic Lodge
Did Jesse James live well into the 20th Century?
Did fat man and little boy need to be dropped on Japan?
Do moral absolutes exist? What do the masons believe?
Communism abolishes eternal truths
Roosevelt had prior knowledge of the Pearl Harbour bombing
Masonic beliefs and rituals
Separation of Church and State
Was the universe created?
Masonry compared to the Catholic Church
Masons who have left the organization
Where do rights come from?
Where did the name “America” come from?
It is time to wake up!
Now some exciting bonus material :
As James Jankiewicz was also at the conference, he and Ralph got into a discussion about doing a short biopic covering what Ralph has been up to over the years and offering some insight into Ralph’s history. This biopic (Ralph Epperson – In His Own Words (27 Minutes)) has now been completed and is included as disc 5 in this special 5 DVD package.
It comes handsomely packaged in a single width premium quality clear DVD case with full wrap artwork.
We are offering this 5DVD, 7 Hour and 29 minute long feature for $45 for NON-HOTT Club Member and $37 for HOTT Club Members.
To obtain your copy send cash, check or money order payable to “Veritas” to Hour of the Time, PO Box 940 Eagar, AZ, 85925.
THIS SET SHIPS FROM THE USA WITH FIRST SHIPMENTS MAILING ON OCTOBER 12th, 2015
HOTT would like to pass along some news from James Jankiewicz, the director and producer of “The Hour of Our Time: The Legacy of William Cooper”, the documentary on Milton William Cooper released at our HOTT Conference in 2006.
James has informed us that this documentary has recently been picked up by a third party digital distributor. This will allow the film, and subsequently Bill’s story, to have access to a wider more mainstream audience. This is a unique and unprecedented opportunity for James as it is rare a film that has been offered for free for over 5 years online would still be attractive to a third party distributor.
What this means to us here at HOTT however, is that all free versions currently running online must be taken down for the duration of the contract – which runs for a few years. We will be free to upload to youtube again at the expiration of the agreement. As such the copy available on our youtube channel will be taken down by the end of this week.
The film is now available for digital download from several digital media providers as a one time rental or purchase. We must reiterate that this arrangement has been negotiated through the producer/copyright holder of the documentary and not through HOTT.
Here at HOTT we are very aware of the lost income and web traffic that results from people copying, posting and selling our works without permission. Because the terms of this agreement specify that the distribution company holds all rights to digital delivery we must, and will comply with their request to remove it from our youtube channel.
If anyone if interested in renting or purchasing a digital version of the film, we’re including these links to where it can now be found online.
Do note that the Hour of the Time receives no compensation, financial or otherwise from your purchase of this film from any of these providers. If you would like a physical DVD copy of the film, the last few copies of the original duplication run are still available through us.
Thank you for your continued support.