Headerimage

72 Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation in Boston!

Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston!

Boston – National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons were ambushed by elements of a Para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw.

Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement.

Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices. The governor, who described the group’s organizers as “criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government’s efforts to secure law and order.

The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed wide-spread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed assault weapons.

Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms.

One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that “none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily.”

Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government’s plans.

During a tense standoff in the Lexington town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists.

Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange.

Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces over matched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.

Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops.

Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, who have been identified as “ringleaders” of the extremist faction, remain at large.

And this fellow Americans, is how the American Revolution began, April 20, 1775.

 

On July 4th, 1776 these same extremists signed the Declaration of Independence, pledging to each other and their countrymen their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. Many of them lost everything, including their families and their lives over the course of the next few years.

Lest we forget…

 

You Can Trust Government

20130611_NateBeeler

The Hidden Hand That Shaped History

 

The

Hidden Hand

That

Shaped History

 

THHMTD

Secret Symbols of the Rosicrucians

Secret Symbols

of 

the

Rosicrucians

 

SSOTR

VNS and CAJI/IS Exclusive – AMERICA’S QUICK FIX: A NATIONAL MORATORIUM

AMERICA’S QUICK FIX: A NATIONAL MORATORIUM

Veritas News Service

and

CAJI/IS Exlusive

08May13

Author Chuck Frank

PCDH

The U.S. Constitution, which is all but four handwritten pages long, is dwarfed by an out-of-control U.S. bureaucratic process which speaks for itself with reams of legalism and regulations while the fat cats of the agencies plan for additional policies and their own retirements. Yet all that is needed is one paragraph to take care of and eliminate the extortion of an over-regulated dinosaur which has produced numerous lost rights, the invasion of privacy, world record incarceration, and big government. Here is my proposal to stop this bullet train before it is too late. Except for a few instances where there is a clear and present danger to human life and runaway abuse, let it be known that WE THE PEOPLE now declare by decree a moratorium on all laws being made either by Congress, Presidential executive orders, state legislators, governors, county supervisors, or city councils.

We include in this declaration a proposal that all government agencies be cut at least by half or more. In addition, we now call upon the people, with the help of grand juries, pastors, farmers, private investigators, small businessmen and women, along with those of the newly elected impartial watchdog committees, to roll back any previous laws and over taxation that have recklessly infringed upon the inalienable God-given rights of the people. Thus the people’s protections of true representation and liberty, will once again flourish in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Big government’s treasonous trashing of the U.S. Constitution and the economy will be dealt with while two-thirds of the outsourcing of our jobs to numerous countries abroad will be stopped. Also included in this decree is the following: Lobbying by bloated special interest organizations which are worth millions is banned while any person that runs for any office in America or those persons who are appointed to government agencies or other offices will have extensive background checks. Also, persons who are part of government agencies in no way can be an ex CEO of a megacorporation. This includes any person who performed their duties in any executive capacity such as a vice-president while being part of a for-profit or a nonprofit corporation such as a Fortune 500 company. Furthermore, any presently-employed government czar who had previously served with corporations of this kind will be relieved of their duties and may not serve in any part of government.

Does this sound like communism? Absolutely not. This proposal is fully anti-communist as anyone can see. This is necessary in that the corporate lords of the nation and those of the worldly shadow elite are taking us down a road of tyranny and monopolistic destruction to where we as a people are very quickly losing our freedom and individual rights to a carefully-orchestrated international anti-sovereignty meltdown. It is brought to you by those rogue individuals of the republic, the U.N., and the New World Order. We as a people have been taken captive by an evil NWO plan of world domination that is meant to enslave the entire planet for the benefit of a few. It is now time to act for it is one minute to midnight. The sinister grand plan is spelled out here by David Rockefeller:

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination (i.e., an ethical form democracy, “freedom to choose” based upon true christian guidelines; the author’s definition) practiced in past centuries."

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.  "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

“Nor did these lawyers and bankers walk about suffused with guilt. They had the moral equivalent of teflon on their soul. Church on Sunday, foreclose on Monday.” —Norman Mailer, New York Review of Books, 27 March 2002

VNS and CAJI/IS Exclusive – THE GREEN CZARS EXPOSED: A WAVE OF DESTRUCTION & THE DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION OF AMERICA

THE GREEN CZARS EXPOSED:

A WAVE OF DESTRUCTION &

THE DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION OF AMERICA

Author: Chuck Frank

TGZ

Globalists and environmentalists have a lot of common ground. They will use any crisis or even create one to further their objectives such as climate change. Then again, if 1000 endangered species isn’t enough ammunition to dismantle dams and the industrial complex of America, use the 2008 housing meltdown which was the result of the deregulation of the banks when Bill Clinton signed it into law before he left office. By doing so, he destroyed the country’s economic protections which had been in place since the Great Depression. Allen Greenspan and the rest of the banking club rode this wave of destruction. These “experts” placed the entire nation at risk as they were entwined with a “greed driven” deregulation policy which then brought on the great foreclosure disaster to millions. With such a failed track record, why is the Federal Reserve still in business and where is our own government’s credibility? It is zero!

Looking further into the wonderful world of finance, let’s not forget when the elite bankers came to town with their sinister scheme which would rake in billions selling an overblown environmental crisis while making loans to the many unsuspecting nations who were already broke. With interest, the IMF and the World Bank was there to “help” but when these nations could no longer pay their loans, then came the land grab. Countries like Germany are already waking up to the cold reality of a green energy sink hole that has an appetite for endless sustainability while costing the people extra Euros that are in the billions.  Here is Daniel Wentzel’s take on it: “Almost all predictions about the expansion and cost of German wind turbines and solar panels have turned out to be wrong – at least by a factor of two, sometimes by a factor of five.” –Daniel Wentzel, Die Welt, 20 October 2012.

The shock waves and cost burdens for consumers and industry have reached a “barely tolerable level that threatens the deindustrialization of Germany,” outraged business organizations said. All of Germany has been arguing about who is to blame for the “electricity price hammer” while Chancellor Angela Merkel had “promised” that green energy subsidies would not be more than 3.6 cents per kilowatt hour. Now, however, German citizens have to support renewable energy by more than EUR 20 billion – instead of 14 billion Euros. Daniel Wentzel asks the question, “How could Merkel be so wrong?” This isn’t “saving” the planet or anybody for that matter, but what it does is create havoc and poverty. What if you were a third world country implementing green energy? Soup lines anybody? How many missions is America going to need?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/25/an-ill-wind-blows-from-wind-turbiines/

Since 2001, the U.S. has lost 42,400 factories:

http://prospect.org/article/plight-american-manufacturing

America, like Germany, is crashing into a true de-industrialization mode. So what does the green agenda really have to offer? The best example is to look at the wages of the Western Rivers Conservancy out of Portland, Oregon, where employees currently earn about $72,186.00 per year (their stats) while our minimum wage may only bring in $16,000.00. This is the environmentalist grand plan for saving the planet or themselves? Everybody please say “thank you” to Western Rivers while the rest of America does with much less. Don’t forget too that the Klamath Dam at the headwaters of the Klamath River is on their chopping block list. One must understand how Western Rivers works it. In their own words, here are a few of their outrageous “grand plan” goals that are mentioned in their annual report:

“Increase the funds to 10 million dollars to “SEIZE” LAND PURCHASES.

“Focus on high quality rivers, and CONTROL WHOLE RIVERS FROM THE SOURCE TO THE MOUTH.”

www.westernrivers.org

Take note above. It is “Rivers” ending with a big “S.” Is the Feather River next? How about the Sacramento River or the American River? With these organizations there is no end to their appetite. The rivers could be full to the brim with fish pre-American Revolution times yet they would still not be happy. It’s called more donations to their fabricated cause. The endgame: sabotage American family farmers through burdensome federal policies and limit their amount of water.

Remember the Delta queens and the smelt fish debacle? Deprivatize family farms while Big Agri takes over. Is there any end to the loss and the destruction of family farms in America? Historically, there is also something to be learned here from Stalin’s 1933 takeover of Ukraine’s family farms. Fact check: 7 million men, women, and children died from starvation. Are we still America or are we some other country that is being ruled by the green czars of a lost republic? Question: When are the American people going to act and stand up for their inalienable rights, or perhaps they will just be content with their food stamps and cellphones? Something tells me they won’t be. “One does not live on bread alone.”

The Human-Hating Roots of the Green Movement

Behind the environmentalist facade lies a totalitarian agenda that is already being enacted.

By Arnold Ahlert April 24, 2013

Monday was the 43rd celebration of Earth Day, an event hailed as an effort to promote responsible stewardship of the environment. Fittingly, it is also the birthdate of Communist Party creator Vladimir Lenin, a reality that the radical environmentalists responsible for the creation of Earth Day dismiss as a mere coincidence. Yet there is little question that under the guise of "saving the planet," the earth-firster crowd would be more than willing to impose the same kind of totalitarian control over the masses envisioned by Lenin.

Like communism, the radical environmentalism that forms the heart of Earth Day celebrations is all about collectivism. In a 2007 column for the Cato Institute, former Czech Republic president Vaclav Klaus called environmentalism one of the main dangers to freedom in the 21st century. "Environmentalism only pretends to deal with environmental protection," writes Klaus. "Behind their people- and nature-friendly terminology, the adherents of environmentalism make ambitious attempts to radically reorganize and change the world, human society, our behavior, and our values."

The Earth Day concept was developed by then-Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-WI), Congress's foremost environmentalist. Nelson also helped to develop college "sit-ins," where professors surreptitiously abandoned their curriculums to lecture students on the evils of imperialist America and the virtues of communism, a misunderstood system of governance that merely need better implementation to succeed.

Nelson's efforts were facilitated by Denis Hayes. Hayes was a student at Stanford University, where he was elected student body president and became a high-profile anti-Vietnam War activist who once helped lead a student siege of a campus weapons-research laboratory.

Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich was the third man behind the Earth Day cult. Ehrlich's claim to fame was The Population Bomb, a book that predicted societal disintegration, and hundreds of millions of deaths from famine — by the 1980s — due to the "cancer" of human population growth. In 1969 Nelson and Ehrlich decided that a nation enthralled by the ethos of Woodstock was ready for a nationwide teach-in on environmentalism. Hayes was brought in to coordinate and implement the operation. The trio decided that the first Earth Day would be held on April 22, 1970 — the centennial celebration of Lenin's birthday.

The philosophical alignment between Lenin, who issued a decree known as "On Land," declaring all natural resources the exclusive property of the state, and environmentalists, who believe that private enterprise and private property are impediments to saving the planet, are unmistakeable. To a large extent, those radical impulses have been realized in the United States. The federal government owns nearly 30 percent of all the land in the country, including five states where it owns more than half. Much of it remains federalized via the Endangered Species Act, which allows government to cordon off property from development if an endangered species is living on it. Furthermore, until the Supreme Court stopped the EPA last year, that agency was using the Clean Water Act to mandate what private property owners could or could not do with their own property, while preventing those owners from seeking recourse in the courts. "In a nation that values due process, not to mention private property, such treatment is unthinkable," said Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the court's decision.

The EPA was created by Congress eight months after the first Earth Day celebration.

Another major player promoting Earth Day is the Earth Day Network (EDN), founded in 1994 by the organizers of the first Earth Day celebration. The most insidious plank of EDN's "core programs" is its "Greening Schools and Promoting Environmental Education" agenda. EDN provides educators with a variety of games, interactive quizzes and other aids, that enable them to teach kids from kindergarten through twelfth grade how to be the best "green" citizens they can be. Much of EDN's emphasis is centered on making kids feel guilty about the size of their "ecological footprint" in comparison to children from other nations. "If everyone lived like you," EDN tells children, "we would need [X-number of] planets" to sustain the lives of all the earth's people." EDN's message is subtle but clear: capitalism is unjust and, as a result, America is using more than its "fair share" of the world's resources.

Hayes, who sits on EDN's Board of Directors, makes this plain. "Under communism prices were not allowed to reflect economic reality," Hayes contends. "Under capitalism, prices don't reflect ecological reality. In the long run, the capitalist flaw — if uncorrected — may prove to be the more catastrophic. …" Moreover, Hayes makes no bones about the fact that he considers human population growth to be the "most worrisome" environmental problem. "If everyone currently in the world aspires to consume at the same level as, say, the average Swede does, the human population already exceeds the planet's carrying capacity," writes Hayes.

Ira Einhorn who hosted the first Earth Day event at the Fairmount Park in Philadelphia on April 22, 1970, made his own personal contribution to population reduction. Seven years after the event, police raided his apartment and found the remains of his girlfriend, after one of his neighbors complained about a reddish- brown, foul-smelling liquid leaking into the ceiling directly below Einhorn's closet. After 23 years on the run, he was extradited from France, convicted of murder and is serving a life sentence.

Another major player in the radical environmentalist movement is a Canadian named Maurice Strong. After starting his career in the oil business in the 1950s, Strong cultivated contacts in the Canadian government. By 1966, he became head of the Canadian International Development Agency. His success there impressed UN Secretary General U Thant, who asked him to organize the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment in 1972, better known as the first "Earth Summit." The "Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment" created there offered a number of socialist/Marxist ideas, including the transfer of wealth from developed countries to under-developed ones, the need for population control, and "extensive cooperation among nations and action by international organizations in the common interest," aka world governance. It offered 26 principles to advance this agenda.

In 1992, another Earth Summit was held in Rio, out of which the "Rio Declaration on Environment and Development" emerged. Another 27 principles, similar to the pie-in-the-sky, wealth transferring eco- socialist/Marxist agenda that emerged 20 years earlier, was added to the mix. That summit was also led by Strong.

One world government is the primary impetus behind a UN project known as Agenda 21 — originated by Maurice Strong. In 1993, the UN explained its mission. "Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people…Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced." 178 countries have currently adopted Agenda 21. Strong himself, who currently resides in the People's Republic of China, expressed his personal view on what must happen for Agenda 21 to succeed. "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" he asked.

There is little question that such people will try. That is why the term "climate change," which replaced "global warming" when a decade of steady temperatures threatened the credibility of the environmentalists' "irrefutable data" — along with the movement itself — has itself been replaced by the newest catchword, "sustainability." The United Nations Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development held in June 2012 issued a report that reiterated the totalitarian ambitions of both Earth Summits and the Agenda 21

project. "Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective," detailed the trillions of dollars that must be spent moving the entire world towards a "green" economy, where every aspect of human behavior would be regulated by a top-down, command-and-control bureaucracy.

Havel foresaw exactly such a development. "There is no doubt that it is our duty to rationally protect nature for future generations," he writes. "The followers of the environmentalist ideology, however, keep presenting us with various catastrophic scenarios with the intention of persuading us to implement their ideas. That is not only unfair but also extremely dangerous."

That is a far more elegant way of describing how those who celebrate Earth Day envision implementing their agenda. Less elegant, but far more familiar, is the phrase that both communists and radical environmentalists thoroughly embrace, as in, "by any means necessary."

Earth Day was the impetus behind this mushrooming desire for global power, hidden by an environmental facade. Villainous mankind, whose expressions of waywardness have changed over the decades — from the polluter, to the deforester, to the animal species eliminator, and finally to climate fouler of the entire planet — must be brought to heel. Toward that end there has been a remarkable consistency. Earth Day remains a celebration of anti-capitalism, anti-humanism, population control and ill-disguised totalitarianism.

Two of Earth Day's founders make these assertions clear. Denis Hayes: "America has a mechanism to deal with things that are not well-served by the market. It's called government. Government is the way that we assert the fundamental values of the majority, constrained by the rights of the minority. Government is the realm in which we decide what is dispensable and what is — literally — priceless." Paul Ehrlich: "A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions."

Arnold Ahlert is a columnist for FrontPage Magazine1