Headerimage

Citizen Kenya – Veritas News Service Exclusive – 18Feb10

Veritas News Service Exclusive

18Feb10

Contributed by John Spoony

Citizen Kenya

or…

Agent Double-O Soul : WHO is he???


One thing he isn’t is a “natural born citizen” by definition of The Law Of Nations and more importantly, The Constitution For The United States Of America.

Confronted with a challenging fact, a typical pattern of communist strategy is denial through ridicule in hope of convincing the public that it’s false. If that doesn’t work they will try to defame the character of those who accuse them, to weaken their credibility. If that doesn’t work they will threaten their opponent in attempt to scare them away. If that doesn’t work they’re busted… Here’s a brief example, a microcosm if you will: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNEEcUVbLh8

Defenders of Obama’s fraudulent activities tend to regurgitate the standard propaganda fed catch phrases like “right wing extremists”, “out on the fringe”, “Oh, you like Bush better!”, etc.  But despite the massive media campaign to convince America that Barack is unquestionably eligible to hold our federal government’s highest office – and that anyone of the MANY people from the US and abroad who have stepped up to challenge Barack’s failure to present the NECESSARY documents is in the extreme minority – a recent AOL poll suggests that 81% of America WANTS TO SEE HIS ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE.  The truth of the matter is that dozens of legal complaints have been filed against  Mr. Obama, including a group of over 200 military personnel.

Barack Hussein Obama has spent well over a million dollars in legal fees to keep his personal records and credentials sealed from public scrutiny. This includes school records, medical, passport, baptism, adoption records, legal clients and oh yeah,  PROOF OF BIRTH! The very basic requirements for any American to hold office as the Commander In Chief of our great nation are that the candidate must be at least 35 years of age, must have at least 14 years of US residency AND must be a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States Of America. Unfortunately for Mr. Obama, he has yet to prove that he is eligible for this position. What renders any argument over his birth place irrelevant is the FACT that he is not and cannot possibly be a natural born citizen – that is, if it’s even true that Barack Obama Sr., then a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies, is actually his father by birth. There are so many scandalous aberrations and Marxist implications within the historical data of a.k.a. Obama that I had to choose which pieces of the puzzle to cram into this short article. Let’s proceed…

From Whence Did He Come?

That’s the $64,000 question. Numerous sources implicate that he was born in Kenya on August 4th, 1961 to an 18 year old girl named Stanley Ann Dunham – then the story gets fuzzy. In September 2008, The Times Herald wrote of the first civil lawsuit filed against O by Philip J. Berg, a fellow democrat:

The suit alleges Dunham traveled to Kenya during her pregnancy at age 18 and was prevented from boarding an airline flight back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy. She reportedly gave birth to Obama in Kenya, then flew home to Hawaii and registered his birth there, according to a memo supporting the motion for the temporary restraining order. Under U.S. law at the time of the Illinois lawmaker’s birth, if he had been born abroad, and one parent was a U.S. citizen, his mother would have had to live ten years in the U.S., five of which after she reached 14 (years of age), according to court papers. If Dunham was only 18 years old when she gave birth to her son, Berg says, her baby would not have met U.S. citizenship requirements.”

On November 5th 2008 the Kenyan Parliament recorded an interesting conversation to support the claim that O was actually born in Kenya (and not Hawaii) as suggested above. Adding to the mystery of our subject’s origin, a question has been posed as to how Obama’s mama could have attended college in Washington State just 2 weeks after the alleged day of his birth. Indeed there is a long list of inconsistencies to the official and fiercely propagated assumption that a.k.a. Obama was born in the State of Hawaii, including his own Kenyan Grandmother’s insistence that “Barack, Jr. was born in Mombosa, Kenya and I was present during his birth.”.  The Kenyan Registrar is also said to have openly admitted that they have O’s birthing records and birth delivery records but have sealed and classified them “top secret” as a result of the presidential election. Peter Ogegio, Kenyan Ambassador to the United States also admitted that O was born in Kenya. And then there’s the matter of the KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE submitted by Lucas Daniel Smith.

I guess Obama’s media machine has pretty strong evidence of citizenship with the fraudulent COLB (certificate of live birth) posted on their “Fight The Smears” website and the statements issued by media tycoon Walter Annenberg’s “FactCheck” organization – Not really. It turns out that Obama himself was Board Chair and President of the Annenberg Foundation’s Chicago Challenge (and working  in close association with Bill Ayers of The Weather Underground infamy). It’s interesting to note that Walter Annenberg, who inherited his fathers newspaper business was appointed Ambassador to the United Kingdom’s Court Of St. James by President Richard Nixon. And yes, he was knighted. Wow, that made him a servant of England! This reminds me of that creepy Twighlight Zone episode where the martians land with open arms and the earthlings find a book of theirs entitled “To Serve Man” – which turns out to be a cookbook. Now who was O speaking for when he said “We’re taking America back!”???

The Name Game

Interestingly, Junior wasn’t the only one in his family to have used a variety of different names and social security numbers on important legal documents. His mother Stanley Ann, stepfather Lolo, Grammy and Gramps Dunham and his wife Michelle have also been alleged to do so as well. It makes one wonder if it had anything to do with all those CIA connections, the commie kinship, if it was just a habitual criminal practice passed down through the family tree or all of the above.

Reportedly, Rolla Payne (maternal great grandfather of O) is said to have been born and raised in  Kansas but his social security number was issued in Oklahoma. He leased Kansas farmland to Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company and also worked for them as an accountant. Rolla Payne does not appear to be listed in the Social Security Death Index. His daughter Madelyn (Payne) Dunham worked as a mechanic and then an aircraft inspector for Boeing, a company secretly owned by the financial benefactor of Rockefeller. Later she worked as a vice president for two major banks. Possible aliases linked to Madelyn L. Dunham are William A Mai Residence Payne, Kelly L. Schippleck , Kelly A. Dunham and Kelly L. Dunham. Many conflicting reports surround the death of Grandma Dunham, spanning between October 21st and November 3rd 2008 – one day before the presidential election.  Barack did not attend her memorial service. Stanley Armour Dunham (O’s Grandfather) and wife Madelyn were members of the CPUSA (Communist Party of the United States of America). Stanley’s time in military service does not coincide with the time of his daughters birth. Neither does his name appear in the Social Security Death Index. A possible alias for Stan is Wesley Arnel Dunham (wife, Madelyn F.). No marriage certificate is found on record for Stanley/Madelyn and no funerals were held for either of them. Just memorial services. The same is true of Stanley Ann, their only daughter. Possible aliases for her are Sandra Lee Dunham, Susan N. Dunham, Stephen O. Dunham, Scott A. Dunham, with people searches on Ann showing more than one (active and inactive) social security number. Barack and Michelle continued these family traditions…

Marxist Radicals

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to

the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

- Saul Alinsky, Rules For Radicals (opening dedication)

Chicago, Illinois circa 1919 was the birthplace and remains a stronghold of the American communist movement. This is where O began his political career. Coincidence? Considering his family history, no. Frank Marshall Davis of Kansas, a rather famous communist poet and journalist, having moved to Hawaii 14 years prior to the Dunham family (and spent some time in Chicago before that) was known as a mentor to young Barack.  O won his seat in the Illinios State Senate as a member of the New Party, a creation of the quasi-Marxist DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) and ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). Obama was an attorney for ACORN and they played a major role in his campaign and election to the Presidency. When ACORN came under severe scrutiny for voter fraud O abandoned them, saying they don’t represent him, but during his campaign he said they would have an influence on him. The guy has a history of changing ‘his’ story. Three key figures in his rise to political success were Frank Marshall Davis, Vernon Jarrett and George Soros, all Marxist radicals in practice and philosophy, if not overtly, covertly.  Vernon Jarrett is the former Father in law of Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s Chief Advisor.

As many of us have seen and heard, Obama’s entire cabinet is made up of Marxist radicals – and it’s quite obvious by now, that is his agenda – to usurp and destroy our constitutional freedoms.

Comments

  1. Obama has already shown his birth certificate, the official birth certificate of Hawaii. Yes, the Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate. (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).

    It is not possible to get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says “born in Hawaii” on it (as Obama’s does) unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. AND, in Obama’s case, the facts on the birth certificate–that he was born in Hawaii in 1961–were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, who are members of a Republican governor’s administration.

    The Wall Street Journal said:

    “Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn.”

  2. Obama has already shown his birth certificate, the official birth certificate of Hawaii. Yes, the Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate. (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).

    It is not possible to get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says “born in Hawaii” on it (as Obama’s does) unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. AND, in Obama’s case, the facts on the birth certificate–that he was born in Hawaii in 1961–were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, who are members of a Republican governor’s administration.

  3. Obama has already shown his birth certificate, the Certification of Live Birth, which is now the official birth certificate of Hawaii.

    Yes, the Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate. (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).

    It is not possible to get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says “born in Hawaii” on it (as Obama’s does) unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. AND, in Obama’s case, the facts on the birth certificate–that he was born in Hawaii in 1961–were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, who are members of a Republican governor’s administration.

  4. “The more we learn about barry, the less we know.”

    Well said.

    As for the article, I did not realize how fishy this O’s birth certificate story is until now. I always found it strange that O’s grandmother was reported dead the day before O’s election win. Did O’sgrandmother now something that most Americans need to know?

  5. Obama has already shown his birth certificate, the official birth certificate of Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate. (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).

    It is not possible to get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says “born in Hawaii” on it (as Obama’s does) unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. AND, in Obama’s case, the facts on the birth certificate–that he was born in Hawaii in 1961–were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, who are members of a Republican governor’s administration.

  6. The correct term is Citizen of the United States. Not a lower case citizen. citizen of the United States is different than Citizen of the United States.

    The 1st is a federal citizen. The 2nd is a State Citizen.

  7. “The correct term is Citizen of the United States. Not a lower case citizen. citizen of the United States is different than Citizen of the United States. The 1st is a federal citizen. The 2nd is a State Citizen.”

    I did not notice that, but you are correct. There are two kinds of Citizenships.

  8. Good article, forkwarper. Nicely done.

    The eligibility issue is a red herring. It keeps folks spinning in circles chasing their tails. Whether legitimate or not, as a practical matter this will simply never get this man removed from office. It would need to be done through the courts; it hasn’t and it will never be. Meanwhile the whole thing has caused another deep split in the opposition and the Democrats and the rest of the traitors are laughing their asses off.

    And for what it’s worth, it’s no big mystery who this clown is. He’s a new age communist revolutionary from the black power school. Simple as that.

  9. “Does this mean any land patent signed by this ‘president’ is null and void?”

    Yes, everything Barry O does from January 20 2009 – January 20 2013 is null and void, if there is evidence to prove he is not a natural-born Citizen.

  10. @Stephen
    It means, he is not President. He is an imposter. Anything he does is a crime and has no effect. That wont stop them from trying to enforce it.

  11. @ann1
    Ann1, whats the deal with you publishing your comment over and over?

    We get your point but your wrong. There is more evidence to the contrary then there is in support of Obama.

    The odd thing about your supposive document that you talked about, there are more than one that look totally different. How can this be? The same certificate of Live Birth is longer when 1 person shows it and shorter when another? Ive seen the pics myself.

    Also, this has been in court. That means, someone has to certify under oath that this live birth is in fact true and correct and that he was born in Hawaii and not born somewhere else and then brought into the country and obtained a certificate of live birth.

    Without this certification under oath, the live certificate of birth is hearsay and inadmissible in court.

    What that means is, its no proof at all. It can’t be used as evidence because it is just hearsay. No one has backed it up like you believe. You were fed misinformation. Those people that said it is it, said no such thing. All they said was that they saw it. What does that mean? Nothing.

    Please bring your proof. Your spouting misinformation.

  12. This is from Paul Mitchell at SupremeLaw.org

    Still lurking very deep beneath these eligibility cases is a
    MUCH LARGER FRAUD, explained in some detail here:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/before.and.after.htm
    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/bohica.htm

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/subpoena/letter.to.consul.general.htm

    Briefly, because federal citizenship did not officially exist until 1866, and
    because none of the Qualifications Clauses has ever been amended,
    federal citizens are — by definition – NOT eligible to serve in the Office
    of President of the United States of America:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#2

    ARTICLE II.

    Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in
    a President of the United States of America.
    (repeating: this Clause has never been amended either!)

    Note well the occurrence of “United States of America” here!
    That term refers ONLY to the several States of the Union,
    of which there are now 50:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/dict/bldu1.htm#union
    (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary controls the meaning of terms used in the U.S. Constitution)

    Now, please read on (and study too :)

    > I cannot understand why this “president” …
    > doesn’t just come out and address this issue armed with conclusive proof of
    > ……… his birth!

    I can understand it quite easily:

    PROOF OF MR. OBAMA’S BIRTH IN MOMBASA DISQUALIFIES HIM!
    That he is an “officer of the United States” assumes facts not in evidence.

    This certified evidence filed at the Third Circuit in Philadelphia
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm
    calls for the conclusion that he was born at Coast Provincial
    General Hospital in Mombasa and, as such, he is NOT a
    “natural born Citizen” of ONE OF the States united:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/swornaff.htm#delaguerra
    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/quals.htm
    http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/18stat23.gif <— properly spelled here: "Citizen" not "citizen"

    There is a difference — a BIG DIFFERENCE:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/subpoena/letter.to.consul.general.htm

    Admitting that publicly would constitute an open admission
    that he is a principal in numerous FELONY Federal offenses:
    see 18 U.S.C. 2, 241, 242, 371, 911, 912, 1961 et seq., for starters.

    SECOND NOTICE OF INTENT TO LODGE
    VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION
    On information and belief and on behalf of the United States (Federal government) appearing before this honorable Court ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General, Relator hereby declares his specific intent to lodge a VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION formally charging Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, and others as yet unnamed herein, with one or more counts of impersonating an Officer of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912, of impersonating a citizen of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 911, of conspiracy against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, and of conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activities in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(d).
    This honorable Court of Appeals will also please take mandatory judicial notice of the published heading on the Federal criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 911, which has no legal force or effect and which deceptively appears as follows:
    “Citizen of the United States”
    whereas the body of that statute, which does have legal force and effect, correctly uses the following nomenclature:
    “citizen of the United States”
    The former, of course, occurs in the Qualifications Clauses requiring candidates for the House, Senate and White House to be State Citizens aka Citizens of one of the United States of America; whereas the latter occurs in the 1866 Civil Rights Act and in numerous subsequent Acts of Congress affecting federal citizens e.g. see the civil statute now at issue in the instant case at 42 U.S.C. 1983 (“any citizen of the United States” [sic]). Cf. Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (1905).

    [end excerpt]

    I'll now repeat more of the pertinent details from a
    prior email message which I wrote recently:

    Dear Sir:

    I have received a copy of an email message in which you wrote:

    "I … was totally put off by your seemingly unfounded claim that Obama was born in Kenya.
    What evidence do you have to support this claim?"

    For starters — but by no means the whole story — please see:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm

    … in which my office entered into evidence this Official Report
    by the National Assembly of the Republic of Kenya:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/Kenya/National.Assembly.Official.Report.2008-11-05.pdf

    … and this accompanying Press Release:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/Kenya/Embassy.Press.Release.2008-11-05.pdf

    There were absolutely no rebuttal(s) in opposition to our
    DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE,
    which in and of itself is highly significant.

    See Rule 201(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, in chief.
    [ http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule201 ]

    One of the main problems — which you have correctly identified –
    is the LACK of evidence proving that Mr. Obama is eligible and
    qualified for the Office of President of the United States of America.

    As such, that he is an "officer of the United States"
    assumes facts not in evidence. This alone means that
    employees of the U.S. Department of Justice may NOT
    represent him legally, until that matter is first decided
    in Obama's favor. Absent that evidence, he remains
    a private individual who must be represented legally
    by a private, licensed Counsel.

    [ In fact, he was legally represented by private Counsel here:
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/entry.of.appearance.lavelle/ ]

    Consequently, when DOJ shows up with a MOTION TO DISMISS
    such lawsuits challenging his eligibility, such a MOTION should
    be stricken from the record for lacking requisite powers of attorney [or tabled].
    See the McDade Act, 28 U.S.C. 530B, concerning willful (legal)
    misrepresentation, and 28 U.S.C. 547 (OUSA's general powers of attorney).

    ["OUSA" = Office of the United States Attorney]

    Moreover, this SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE is now PAST DUE:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/subpoena/
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/subpoena/letter.to.consul.general.htm

    At some point, Mr. Obama's protracted silence can not only be
    construed as fraud, pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel; moreover,
    that silence also activates legal estoppel, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen.

    These are standing rules of decision which have been issued by
    courts of competent jurisdiction; they are not my inventions.

    The other, even more serious problem, is the widespread failure by
    current American courts correctly to construct the Qualification Clause
    for President, contrary to a long line of cases which any capable
    lawyer should be able to locate, given their ready availability now
    on the Internet. On this point, please see:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/swornaff.htm#delaguerra
    http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm (and all links at the end)

    e.g.:
    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/before.and.after.htm
    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/bohica.htm

    Thus, in our professional opinion, one of THE issues which current
    American courts are doing everything possible to OBSCURE
    is the far-reaching implications of the 1866 Civil Rights Act:

    (1) it did not and could not amend any of the Qualifications Clauses,
    because Congress cannot by legislation alter the Constitution:
    Eisner v. Macomber; if it didn't amend the Constitution in any manner,
    then all the Qualifications Clauses STILL retain today the meaning
    which they had when they were first ratified on June 21, 1788:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/quals.htm
    [see links to correct spellings, as published officially in the Statutes at Large]

    (2) because the Dred Scott decision explained in such great detail
    why a black slave could not be a Citizen of Missouri (read State Citizen)
    as of 1856, the 1866 Civil Rights Act did not and could not confer
    that status upon any blacks, absent a Constitutional Amendment:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dredscot/excerpt1.htm <— frequently overlooked by lawyers like Lincoln

    (3) in order to be constitutional, the 1866 Civil Rights Act had to be
    Federal MUNICIPAL law, at best, with a territorial reach that was
    confined to D.C. and Federal enclaves, territories and possessions;
    it did not and could not amend or otherwise alter the meaning of
    "Citizen of the United States" as the latter term occurs in the
    organic U.S. Constitution, because that term means
    "Citizen of ONE OF the States united":

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/swornaff.htm#delaguerra
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sanmarco/complain.htm#one-of
    http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr11.htm
    (begin reading at "the source of all sovereignty" for extensive authority(s))

    (4) as such, the 1866 Civil Rights Act resulted in creating a
    second class of "federal citizens" who are, by definition,
    subject to the MUNICIPAL jurisdiction of the Congress:
    http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/dict/federal.citizenship.htm
    after extensive searching before the Internet became
    widely available, we located the following cases which
    held — correctly — that we have two (2) classes of citizens
    in America, not one (1) class:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm
    http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm#pannill
    (federal citizens were not even contemplated when the organic Constitution was being drafted;
    as such, they are NOT eligible to occupy the Office of President, by definition)

    [cf. http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/dict/federal.citizenship.htm <– very revealing definition!]

    (5) because it attempted to confuse that second class
    with the primary class of State Citizens, we argue that
    the 1866 Civil Right Act is void for vagueness on this key point;
    cf. also "idem sonans" for another obscuring legal rationalization;
    as such, it is and was unconstitutional from the moment it was
    first enacted, and unconstitutionality dates from the moment of
    enactment, not from any court decision(s) so branding it:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr10.htm
    (scroll to the end concerning unconstitutionality)

    (6) moreover, American Courts have also ruled that a
    ratified Fourteenth Amendment did not create this second class;
    at best it was merely declaratory of existing law, that existing law
    being the 1866 Civil Rights Act (assuming it was constitutional):

    http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/append-y.htm

    (7) as explained in great historical detail by the Utah Supreme
    Court in 1968 — 100 years after the fact — the so-called
    Fourteenth amendment [sic] was never lawfully ratified:
    27 is still less than 28, particularly when the method of
    counting YES votes by the several States' Legislatures
    is taken into account:

    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm#dyett
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/nordbrok/note14am.htm

    And so, the cases challenging Obama all must face
    these well established historical facts, or run the risk
    of generating more demonstrably bad case law if they do not.

  13. Obama was not born in Kenya or Mombassa (which was not part of Kenya at the time). His Kenyan grandmother never said that he was born in Kenya. She said that he was born in Hawaii.

    Obama has already shown his birth certificate, and the facts on it were twice confirmed by the two top officials of the Department of Health of Hawaii, who are members of a Republican governor’s administration.

    Obama has shown his birth certificate, the official birth certificate of Hawaii. Yes, the Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate. (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).

    It is not possible to get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says “born in Hawaii” on it (as Obama’s does) unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. AND, in Obama’s case, the facts on the birth certificate–that he was born in Hawaii in 1961–were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, who are members of a Republican governor’s administration.

    A Natural Born Citizen is simply a citizen who has not been naturalized. Naturalized citizens are not eligible. Natural Born Citizens are eligible. US born children of foreign citizens are eligible regardless of the number of their parents who were citizens at the moment of birth.

    The definition of Natural Born Citizen is:

    ““Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.”

    All US-born citizens are Natural Born Citizens. That is why such prominent conservative Senators who are also lawyers as Orren Hatch and Lindsay Graham say that a Natural Born Citizen is simply one who was born in the USA:

    Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:

    “Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)

    Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:

    “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004

  14. The evidence is documented in the article Ann. There’s no need to repeat it. You seem to think we believe everything that comes out of a republican’s mouth. Black’s Law Dictionary did not exist at the time The Constitution For The United States Of America was written and ratified. Obama wrote in his own book that he possessed his original long form birth certificate and that he cherished it, but that was probably just another one of his many lies.
    http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows

    Spoony

    @ann2

  15. Citizen of Kenya?!!!! what the @#$@#$@… So what now? does congress even know or care for that matter? Oh well… weren’t the globalists trying to squeeze Gov. Arnold into the presidency? I guess they got to undermine our government again unofficially. Well this isn’t all that exciting except that it is probably a new trend…

  16. @ann2
    Its a shame you continue to spew crap even though I have already disputed your info.

    No one has confirmed anything. No one has certified anything.

    Per your statement here

    “Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)

    Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:

    “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004″

    A natural born Citizen is not a natural born citizen. A citizen is a federal citizen born in the United States and one of its teritorries.

    A Natural Born Citizen can not be born in the United States or one of its teritories.

    A Natural Born Citizen can only be born within the USA wich is not the United States nor its territories.

    It will take you a while to understand this one.

  17. One longtime Jewish observer of the political scene, who did not want to be identified, said admiringly that “Jews made him. Wherever you look, there is a Jewish presence.”
    http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?sid=212226&id=252218
    Barry has no control over his actions, he is under constant control by the presiding zionists. Barry is also a diversion away from the ZOG. He is a manchurian marionette they dangle in front of everybody.

  18. Re this allegation: “No one has backed it up like you believe. You were fed misinformation. Those people that said it is it, said no such thing. All they said was that they saw it. What does that mean? Nothing.”

    The above statement is false.

    Obama’s birth certificate is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and when it says “born in Hawaii” on it (as Obama’s does), it is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military.

    The officials in Hawaii (who are members of a Republican governor’s administration) have said twice that the facts on the posted birth certificate are confirmed by the original document in the files.

    Here is the most recent:

    “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….” (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-obama-hawaii_N.htm).

    That statement says that she has seen the original record and that it verifies that Obama was born in Hawaii. Repeat VERIFIES THAT OBAMA WAS BORN IN HAWAII.

    Moreover, she did not say that the original document might be a delayed birth certificate or a statement of a witness who did not actually see the birth. She said that the original document says that Obama was born in Hawaii.

    At this point, I sometimes get replies that say something like: “there were five different birth certificates in Hawaii at the time.” This turns out not to be true. But in any case, in NONE of them was it possible to get a birth certificate that said “born in Hawaii” on it unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii.

    In the previous statement to the one quoted above, the spokeswoman for the department was asked whether Dr Fukino was saying that Obama was born in Hawaii.

    Quotes:

    ” Does this mean Obama was born in Hawaii?

    “Yes,” said Hawaii Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo, in both email and telephone interviews with the Tribune. “That’s what Dr. Fukino is saying.” (
    http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/11/obama_hawaaianborn_citizen_for.html)
    End Quotes

    This is even a more direct statement than that above. The statements of the officials indicate that they do not believe that the original was ambiguous or forged, or that it was based on any form of delayed certificate or a document that could have been sworn to by someone who did not actually see the birth. The two statements both say flatly that the original document shows that Obama was born in Hawaii.

  19. It’s important to note that many voters probably between the ages of 18 to 30+ have been trained to vote for Obama using the propaganda of the WWE, formerly the WWF. If we recall, we had a big time hero several years ago. His name: “the Rock”, he was the “people’s champion”. He was dark skinned and from hawaii! His stature, attitudes, appearance, and even the sound and expression of his voice is identical to that of Barack Obama’s!

    Wrestling is notorious for corruption, drugs, sex, and a constant flashing of the satanic hand gesture. Not to mention the drinking of blood, lots of death symbolism and advocates violence for younger viewers.

    It is also well affiliated with politics. Linda MacMahon and Jesse Ventura are politicians among others I’m sure. Mr.Obama also took the time during his campaign to come and preach to the fans saying some of the Rock’s catch phrases! Now if that isn’t luciferian trickery, what is?

    Also worth noting is the big time star that came before the Rock, “Stone Cold Steve Austin” a Texan with a finger flippin’ attitude that takes no S^%T from nobody. Could this have been the programming of young minds to vote for Bush when the time came?

    several years back (not sure if this is still in wrestling) there was the New World Order. This later split into two rival groups the hollywood NWO and the wolfpack NWO. A blatant admittance of using the hegelian dialectic to accomplish one agenda!

    One more thing: day of the London bombings: two “terrorist” characters showed up by surprise at a wrestling event. During the cold war, there were many Russian characters. It seems the politics and the left right paradigm is indoctrinated at a very young age. I watched and adored just as all my peers in those days. But it never had the same effect on me because I am not American.

    I have not been able to find anything on this subject anywhere on the internet and I think that no one has realized the extent to the programming going on in Wrestling among other mediums!

    We can discuss the symbology here for days. If I was a bigger wrestling fan I’m sure I could write a book on it.

  20. @pasky08
    Thanks for your comments Pasky. Interesting insight. Though I’ve never been a fan of “pro wrestling” I’ve always liked The Rock as an actor, and the themes and characters he plays in his movies. You’ve given me food for thought.

    Thanks!
    Spoony

  21. @john spoony

    Sorry, but it is hard if not impossible for Ann to acknowledge your comment do to her vision-impairment caused by her head being located in a not-so fresh smelling location at this time.
    Please check back baring in mind if you happen to make face-to-face contact with this person, Ann, it is advisable to stand upwind and at a safe distant. Eye protection is also recommended.
    That is all. Carry-on,
    :)
    PS clicking the reply link to the right of her/his multi-names may spark an orderless response!

  22. @Belly Of Fire
    @john spoony

    Sorry, but it is hard if not impossible for Ann to acknowledge your comment do to her vision-impairment caused by her head being located in a not-so fresh smelling location at this time.
    Please check back baring in mind if you happen to make face-to-face contact with this person, Ann, it is advisable to stand upwind and at a safe distant. Eye protection is also recommended.
    That is all. Carry-on,
    :)
    PS clicking the reply link to the right of her/his multi-names may spark an orderless response!

  23. Our undercover agents always have legitimate SS#. They are set aside for that purpose so no one will be exposed. I am 69 years old and my SS# wasn’t issued until 1987. I am a member of AFIO.

    Agents for other countries as well as other scoundrels have SS#s that don’t check out.

    “Everything that is secret will be brought out into the open. Everything that is hidden will be uncovered. 3 What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight. What you have whispered to someone behind closed doors will be shouted from the rooftops..” Luke 12:2

    Obama “I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.”

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html

  24. ” BORN IN THE USA?
    Kenyan official: Bamako born here
    In debate over constitution, minister urges African nation to emulate U.S. inclusion

    A Kenyan lawmaker told the nation’s parliament last month that Barrack Bamako was born in Africa and is therefore “not even a native American.”

    Read more: Kenyan official: Bamako born here ”

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=139481