Kansas Tax Fraud – Pt.1 – Veritas News Service Report
Special Veritas News Service Report
Contributed by
“Belly of fire”
Kansas is involved in Fraud, in conjunction with the Federal Government (United States; Federal Statutes as well as Kansas defines United States (in one of its uses) as the Federal Government; see KSA 27), against Kansas Citizens and others that work in the State of Kansas.
Each State of the USA is also involved in this same Fraud against the Citizens that live and work there.
Here is a link to a Kansas Statute that defines Jurisdiction for Federal Property which also calls the Federal government, the United States.
http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-statutes/getStatute.do?number=14180
[excerpt]
27-102
Chapter 27. — FEDERAL JURISDICTION
Article 1. — FEDERAL PROPERTY
27-102. Jurisdiction. That exclusive jurisdiction over and within any lands so acquired by the United States shall be, and the same is hereby, ceded to the United States, for all purposes; saving, however, to the state of Kansas the right to serve therein any civil or criminal process issued under the authority of the state, in any action on account of rights acquired, obligations incurred or crimes committed in said state, but outside the boundaries of such land; and saving further to said state the right to tax the property and franchises of any railroad, bridge or other corporations within the boundaries of such lands; but the jurisdiction hereby ceded shall not continue after the United States shall cease to own said lands.
[end excerpt]
Land ceded to the United States (Federal Government) sets up a “state within a state” (Federal State within Kansas State). Many times this is referred to as “in this state”, “within this state”, “this state”, a “state of the United States” or even just as “state”. This is why in a statute you will see “state of Kansas” and then just “in this state”. These are two different states unless state is defined only as state of Kansas which sometimes it is.
To see an example of the two different states in use, see this link for a marriage statute
http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-statutes/getStatuteInfo.do?number=23-101
Additional Research and Detailed Definitions
Definitions of legal terms are very important so I want to provide you with a couple links that take what I am about to share, into a detailed and deeper level of research.
Analysis of the Public Salary Tax Act
Important for Definitions of “Employee”, “Wages”, “person”, and Additional liability statutes
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
Important on definition of State
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/psta/memo.htm
(focus is on the original definition of “State”)
See also “What State Are You In?” (Chapter 5 of FedZone 11)
http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter5.htm
Kansas Fraudulent Joint Venture With the United States cont’d
I looked up the Kansas Statute to determine if a Kansas Citizen (setting aside the statute, civil law jurisdictional issue), which I am one of, is required to pay Kansas Income tax. You will be shocked as to what I have discovered.
Here is the Kansas statute 79-3296 which is hidden at the bottom of the tax statutes. I am forced to ask, why is that? I will let you answer the question at the end of this article.
I am going to point to (a) & (c).
Kansas Statute 79-3296
http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-statutes/getStatute.do?number=39118
[excerpt]
79-3296
Chapter 79.–TAXATION
Article 32.–INCOME TAX
79-3296. Withholding tax; employer’s requirement to withhold; agreements of the secretary. (a) Every employer who is required under federal law to withhold upon wages pursuant to the federal internal revenue code shall, whenever the wage recipient is a resident of Kansas or the wages shall be paid on account of personal service performed in Kansas, withhold and deduct from such wages an amount to be determined in accordance with K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 79-32,100d, and amendments thereto.
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (a), an employer shall not withhold from the wages of an individual who performs services as an extra in connection with any phase of motion picture or television production or television commercials for less than 14 days during any calendar year. As used in this subsection, the term “extra” means an individual who pantomimes in the background, adds atmosphere to the set and performs such actions without speaking.
(c) A determination by the internal revenue service which relieves an employer or payor from withholding responsibility with respect to payments to an employee or payee shall also apply for Kansas income tax withholding purposes. Where an employer or payor is required to reinstate withholding for federal income tax with regard to any employee or payee, such obligation shall be equally applicable for Kansas withholding purposes.
[end excerpt; emphasis added]
Starting with (a)
Where in the Federal Internal Revenue code (which is Federal Municipal law that only applies to DC, the territories, & land ceded to the Federal government) does it say that a State Citizen (one of the People) or any other person is liable for income taxes?
This must be determined before an “employer” can be required to withhold taxes. Now, I’m not going to address the issue of what is an “employer”, but I will give you a hint, it is the Federal Government in definition. The question also needs to be asked, what are “wages”, and these other legal terms? If I tried to define each term, this would get very, very long. I just want to introduce my discovery in hopes that you will also research this and share it with others.
So make sure to read the 2 links I provided on the PSTA and on the definition of State. Those will give you all the details on definitions.
Let me help you out with the search for income tax liability because you may not know where to look.
Title 26 is the IRC, Internal Revenue Code, and income taxes is Subtitle A. I have linked to both below so that you can show me where the liability is. Income tax liability is in Subchapter A and that is link #3 below.
By the way, for a statute to make someone liable, it must have liable or liability in the statute. It would say something to the effect of: “any person who earns income is liable for income taxes”.
To Be Continued…
Is it true that one can file a modified W-8BEN form and not pay federal income taxes?
Wait for the other parts of the article and then we can talk more about it.
I’ve been active in taxes for longer then I care to admit, both on the personal side (all my working life-time!!) and from a legal viewpoint since satisfying the bar and following tax law. I’ve provided a lot of advice and righted a lot of wrongs, and I must say that what you’ve put up makes complete sense. Please continue the good work – the more individuals know the better they’ll be armed to deal with the tax man, and that’s what it’s all about.
Thank you very much TG. I am in the works of another article that I hope to release soon. I think people need to understand what a taxpayer is. It means more than what it sounds.